Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 14:04 UTC

laravel / multiplex

TypeScriptMIT★ 61 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Aug 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryTerminal interfacehow this is determined

laravel/multiplex holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (55/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LaravelOrganization · verified domain

11,072 followers142 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@laravel/multiplex	0.4.3	568,113	9	30 days ago	tui terminal cli multiplexer process-manager ink laravel

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 139 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully

Inputs used

commits_last_year	139
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 30 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~1.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	10
latest_release_tag	v0.4.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	30
mean_days_between_releases	1.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

34At Risk

How it's scored

28.8/60	Stars — 61 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	61
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

96Exceptional

How it's scored

76.7/80	Monthly downloads — 568,113 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@laravel/multiplex
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	568,113
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.992

Issue & PR responsiveness

53Moderate

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
27.3/30	PR acceptance — 20/22 decided PRs merged
4.3/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	20
open_issues	2
closed_issues	2
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	3
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	3

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 11,072 followers of laravel
25/25	Track record — 142 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11,072
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	laravel
public_repos	142
account_age_days	5,524

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 30 days ago
20/20	Version history — 9 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@laravel/multiplex
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	39
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@laravel/multiplex@0.4.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 39 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

52Moderate

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7/40	Legible commit history — 12 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.132
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	20,253

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.09

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/18 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	25,775
source_files_sampled	18
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

61GitHub stars

2contributors

139commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

10releases

1bus factor

2open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿

0Stars

5Forks

3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 3

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10

6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 14:03 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 2/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	ansi-styles	`^7.0.0`	package.json
npm	commander	`^15.0.0`	package.json
npm	ink	`^7.1.0`	package.json
npm	react	`^19.2.7`	package.json
npm	string-width	`^8.2.2`	package.json
npm	wrap-ansi	`^10.0.0`	package.json

All dependencies 103

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 96 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	direct
npm	ansi-styles	`7.0.0`	direct
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	direct
npm	ink	`7.1.1`	direct
npm	react	`19.2.8`	direct
npm	string-width	`8.2.2`	direct
npm	wrap-ansi	`10.0.1`	direct
npm	@alcalzone/ansi-tokenize	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.5.0`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`19.2.18`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	auto-bind	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.6.2`	indirect
npm	cli-boxes	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	cli-cursor	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	cli-truncate	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	code-excerpt	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	convert-to-spaces	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	environment	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	es-toolkit	`1.50.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-east-asian-width	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-in-ci	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mimic-fn	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	onetime	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	patch-console	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	react-reconciler	`0.33.0`	indirect
npm	restore-cursor	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.27.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	stack-utils	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	tagged-tag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	terminal-size	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	tsx	`4.23.13`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`5.8.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.9.0`	indirect
npm	widest-line	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.3`	indirect
npm	yoga-layout	`3.2.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@laravel/multiplex@0.4.3 pulls in 39 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records