Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 23:15 UTC
latitudesh / cli
⚙️ Command-Line Interface for Latitude.sh
latitudesh/cli holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
69
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Latitude.shOrganization
91 followers17 public repossince Apr 2017
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/latitudesh/lshpoints to another repo — not scored | v1.7.0 | - | 30 | 15 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
77
Development activity
69Good
How it's scored
| 28.8/36 | Push recency — last push 15 days ago |
| 11.8/36 | Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 126 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 126 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 15 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 17 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 30 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 15 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~25.2 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 30 |
| latest_release_tag | v1.7.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 15 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 25.2 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
33
Popularity & adoption
23At Risk
How it's scored
| 21.4/60 | Stars — 22 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 2 forks |
| 1.7/15 | Watchers — 3 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 2 |
| stars | 22 |
| watchers | 3 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
44Weak
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
79
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 12.3/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits |
| 12.2/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 9 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 9 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.453 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
99Exceptional
How it's scored
| 42/42 | Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed |
| 29/30 | PR acceptance — 88/91 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 15/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 88 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 3 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | 1 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 3 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
82Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 14.1/25 | Owner reach — 91 followers of latitudesh |
| 21.1/25 | Track record — 17 public repos, account ~9 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 91 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | latitudesh |
| public_repos | 17 |
| account_age_days | 3,389 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
59
Engineering practices
48Weak
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 2 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
75Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://latitude.sh/docs/cli |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 2 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | command-line, command-line-interface |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://latitude.sh/docs/cli |
| docs_site | https://latitude.sh/docs/cli |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
57
Security posture
57Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 3.8/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 6/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 18 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 0 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.7 |
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
42
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
52Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Go (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no data |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | go.sum |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed) |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/469 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Go |
| largest_source_bytes | 58,588 |
| source_files_sampled | 469 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Key facts
22GitHub stars
9contributors
126commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
30releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- go package 'github.com/latitudesh/lsh' points at a different repository (https://github.com/latitudesh/lsh); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 5 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 10 | Code-Review | all changesets reviewed |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 8 | Vulnerabilities | 2 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 22
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles | v0.21.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea | v1.3.10 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss | v1.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/dave/jennifer | v1.7.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/errors | v0.21.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/runtime | v0.26.2 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/strfmt | v0.22.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/swag | v0.22.7 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/validate | v0.22.6 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/jmespath/go-jmespath | v0.4.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/latitudesh/latitudesh-go-sdk | v1.16.5 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/manifoldco/promptui | v0.9.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir | v1.1.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter | v0.0.5 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pb33f/libopenapi | v0.15.14 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/pkg/browser | v0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141c | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/cobra | v1.8.0 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/pflag | v1.0.5 | go.mod |
| Go | github.com/spf13/viper | v1.18.2 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.37.0 | go.mod |
| Go | golang.org/x/text | v0.14.0 | go.mod |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | go.mod |
All dependencies 81
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 59 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles | v0.21.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea | v1.3.10 | direct |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss | v1.1.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/dave/jennifer | v1.7.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/errors | v0.21.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/runtime | v0.26.2 | direct |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/strfmt | v0.22.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/swag | v0.22.7 | direct |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/validate | v0.22.6 | direct |
| Go | github.com/jmespath/go-jmespath | v0.4.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/latitudesh/latitudesh-go-sdk | v1.16.5 | direct |
| Go | github.com/manifoldco/promptui | v0.9.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir | v1.1.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/olekukonko/tablewriter | v0.0.5 | direct |
| Go | github.com/pb33f/libopenapi | v0.15.14 | direct |
| Go | github.com/pkg/browser | v0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141c | direct |
| Go | github.com/spf13/cobra | v1.8.0 | direct |
| Go | github.com/spf13/pflag | v1.0.5 | direct |
| Go | github.com/spf13/viper | v1.18.2 | direct |
| Go | golang.org/x/term | v0.37.0 | direct |
| Go | golang.org/x/text | v0.14.0 | direct |
| Go | gopkg.in/yaml.v3 | v3.0.1 | direct |
| Go | github.com/asaskevich/govalidator | v0.0.0-20230301143203-a9d515a09cc2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/atotto/clipboard | v0.1.4 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2 | v2.0.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/bahlo/generic-list-go | v0.2.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/buger/jsonparser | v1.1.2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile | v0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dc | indirect |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi | v0.10.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf | v0.0.13-0.20250311204145-2c3ea96c31dd | indirect |
| Go | github.com/charmbracelet/x/term | v0.2.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/chzyer/readline | v0.0.0-20180603132655-2972be24d48e | indirect |
| Go | github.com/dprotaso/go-yit | v0.0.0-20220510233725-9ba8df137936 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/erikgeiser/coninput | v0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0f | indirect |
| Go | github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify | v1.7.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-logr/logr | v1.3.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-logr/stdr | v1.2.2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/analysis | v0.22.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer | v0.20.2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference | v0.20.4 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/loads | v0.21.5 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/go-openapi/spec | v0.20.13 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/google/uuid | v1.5.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/hashicorp/hcl | v1.0.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap | v1.1.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/josharian/intern | v1.0.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful | v1.2.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/magiconair/properties | v1.8.7 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/mailru/easyjson | v0.7.7 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/mattn/go-isatty | v0.0.20 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/mattn/go-localereader | v0.0.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/mattn/go-runewidth | v0.0.16 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure | v1.5.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/muesli/ansi | v0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/muesli/cancelreader | v0.2.2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/muesli/termenv | v0.16.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/oklog/ulid | v1.3.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go | v1.2.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2 | v2.1.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/rivo/uniseg | v0.4.7 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero | v0.4.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/sagikazarmark/slog-shim | v0.1.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/sahilm/fuzzy | v0.1.1 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/sourcegraph/conc | v0.3.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/spf13/afero | v1.11.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/spf13/cast | v1.6.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/spyzhov/ajson | v0.8.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/subosito/gotenv | v1.6.0 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/vmware-labs/yaml-jsonpath | v0.3.2 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2 | v2.1.8 | indirect |
| Go | github.com/xo/terminfo | v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e | indirect |
| Go | go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver | v1.13.1 | indirect |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel | v1.17.0 | indirect |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric | v1.17.0 | indirect |
| Go | go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace | v1.17.0 | indirect |
| Go | go.uber.org/atomic | v1.9.0 | indirect |
| Go | go.uber.org/multierr | v1.9.0 | indirect |
| Go | golang.org/x/exp | v0.0.0-20240213143201-ec583247a57a | indirect |
| Go | golang.org/x/sync | v0.11.0 | indirect |
| Go | golang.org/x/sys | v0.38.0 | indirect |
| Go | gopkg.in/ini.v1 | v1.67.0 | indirect |
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.