Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 20:50 UTC

launchdarkly / php-server-sdk

LaunchDarkly Server-side SDK for PHP

PHPCustom license★ 39 stars⑂ 47 forkssince Dec 2014View on GitHub ↗

launchdarkly/php-server-sdk holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LaunchDarklyOrganization
317 followers313 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlaunchdarkly/server-sdk6.8.1333,4008442 days agolaunchdarklylaunchdarkly-php

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume33 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained21 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases84 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 42 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~56.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count84
latest_release_tag6.8.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release42
mean_days_between_releases56.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.6/60Stars39 stars
13.9/25Forks47 forks
9.3/15Watchers48 watchers
Inputs used
forks47
stars39
watchers48
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
73.6/80Monthly downloads333,400 downloads/month across packagist
7.4/20Registry dependents12 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslaunchdarkly/server-sdk
dependents12
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads11,511,824
monthly_downloads333,400
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

92Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 19% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth44 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled44
top_contributor_share0.192
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance202/219 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 10/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs202
open_issues1
closed_issues39
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.975
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18/25Owner reach317 followers of launchdarkly
25/25Track record313 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers317
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginlaunchdarkly
public_repos313
account_age_days4,402
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 42 days ago
20/20Version history84 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslaunchdarkly/server-sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish42

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests26 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.launchdarkly.com/sdk/server-side/php
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, launchdarkly, guzzle, feature-flags, feature-toggles, launchdarkly-sdk, sdk, managed-by-terraform
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.launchdarkly.com/sdk/server-side/php
docs_sitehttps://docs.launchdarkly.com/sdk/server-side/php
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests26 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 10/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained21 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/142 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes46,403
source_files_sampled142
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

39GitHub stars
44contributors
33commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
84releases
4bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10
7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 20:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests26 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 10/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained21 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistmonolog/monolog^2.0|^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/cache^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1.0|^2.0|^3.0composer.json
Packagistramsey/uuid^4.7composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/cache^2.2test-service/composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7test-service/composer.json
Packagistkevinrob/guzzle-cache-middleware^7.0test-service/composer.json
Packagistlaunchdarkly/server-sdk*test-service/composer.json
Packagistmikecao/flight^3test-service/composer.json
Packagistmonolog/monolog^3test-service/composer.json
Packagistpsr/log3.*test-service/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache^6.4|^7.2test-service/composer.json
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/cachedirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzledirect
Packagistkevinrob/guzzle-cache-middlewaredirect
Packagistlaunchdarkly/server-sdkdirect
Packagistmikecao/flightdirect
Packagistmonolog/monologdirect
Packagistpsr/cachedirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistramsey/uuiddirect
Packagistsymfony/cachedirect
Packagistbeste/clockindirect
Packagistbeste/in-memory-cacheindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverageindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.