Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 16:46 UTC

leo91000 / graphile_worker_rs

High performance Rust/PostgreSQL job queue (also suitable for getting jobs generated by PostgreSQL triggers/functions out into a different work queue)

RustMIT★ 80 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

leo91000/graphile_worker_rs holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (60/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Léo ColettaPersonal account
14 followers48 public repossince Jan 2012WeWeb

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iographile_worker0.13.53,466350 days agojobspostgresqueueworkerasynchronousdatabase

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume359 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year359
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year48

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_taggraphile_worker_cli-v0.1.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.8/60Stars80 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars80
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.2/80Monthly downloads3,466 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgraphile_worker
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads38,199
monthly_downloads3,466
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 49% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.491
How it's scored
35.5/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance452/465 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs452
open_issues2
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.846
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
8.5/25Owner reach14 followers of leo91000
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginleo91000
public_repos48
account_age_days5,295
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgraphile_worker
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbiome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://leo91000.github.io/graphile_worker_rs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgraphile-worker, postgresql, queues, worker
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://leo91000.github.io/graphile_worker_rs/
docs_sitehttps://leo91000.github.io/graphile_worker_rs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages81
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,108
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbiome.json
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/566 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes41,431
source_files_sampled566
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

80GitHub stars
10contributors
359commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
2open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index crates:graphile_worker@0.13.5; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 16:46 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iographile_worker_crontab_runnerCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_crontab_typesCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_crontab_parserCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_jobCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_ctxCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_migrationsCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_task_handlerCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_shutdown_signalCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_extensionsCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_lifecycle_hooksCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_job_specCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_task_detailsCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_queriesCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_recoveryCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_runtimeCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_databaseCargo.toml
crates.iographile_worker_utilsCargo.toml
crates.iochronoCargo.toml
crates.iofuturesCargo.toml
crates.iogetsetCargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpusCargo.toml
crates.ioserdeCargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonCargo.toml
crates.iosqlxCargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorCargo.toml
crates.iotracingCargo.toml
crates.iotokioCargo.toml
crates.iorandCargo.toml
crates.iohexCargo.toml
crates.ioindocCargo.toml
crates.ioderive_builderCargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetry-30Cargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetryCargo.toml
crates.ioopentelemetry-32Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-opentelemetry-30Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-opentelemetryCargo.toml
crates.iotracing-opentelemetry-32Cargo.toml
All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@antfu/install-pkg1.1.0indirect
npm@egoist/tailwindcss-icons1.9.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@iconify-json/lucide1.2.118indirect
npm@iconify-json/tabler1.2.36indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@iconify/utils3.1.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-ia322.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.5.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/cli4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc1.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.2indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmimport-meta-resolve4.2.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector1.6.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.