Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 05:40 UTC

link-foundation / links-notation

A way to describe data using references and links.

Rust · JavaScript · C#Unlicense★ 5 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

link-foundation/links-notation holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (29/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Link.FoundationOrganization
7 followers164 public repossince Jul 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/link-foundation/links-notation/gov0.14.0-22 days ago
npmlinks-notation0.13.012,0546263 days agolinoparserprotocollinks
PyPIlinks-notation0.14.0-72 days agolinoparserlinksnotationprotocol

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
27/36Commit cadence39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume587 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year587
human_commit_share0.33
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases58 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count58
latest_release_tagphp_0.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases30.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars5
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Unlicense)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges16
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.875
How it's scored
37.2/42Issue resolution89% of issues closed
26.1/30PR acceptance173/199 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs173
open_issues8
closed_issues62
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.886
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
6.5/25Owner reach7 followers of link-foundation
17.2/25Track record164 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginlink-foundation
public_repos164
account_age_days762
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on go, npm, pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history7 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/link-foundation/links-notation/go, links-notation, links-notation
ecosystemsgo, npm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json, .flake8, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs, phpcs.xml, python/pyproject.toml ([tool.flake8], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), python/setup.cfg ([flake8])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://linksplatform.github.io/Protocols.Lino/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://linksplatform.github.io/Protocols.Lino/
docs_sitehttps://linksplatform.github.io/Protocols.Lino/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages157
unassessed_packages15
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 157 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history31 of 33 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.939
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapcsharp/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.Tests/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.Tests.csproj, csharp/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/01-parse-expression/project/TestParseExpression.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json, .flake8, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs, phpcs.xml, python/pyproject.toml ([tool.flake8], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), python/setup.cfg ([flake8])
11/11Static type checkingjs/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance37 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsjs/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestscsharp/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.Tests/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.Tests.csproj, csharp/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation/Link.Foundation.Links.Notation.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/01-parse-expression/project/TestParseExpression.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/02-capture-validate/project/TestCaptureValidate.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/03-semantic-predicates/project/TestSemanticPredicates.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/04-hybrid-approach/project/TestHybrid.csproj, docs/case-studies/csharp-peg-simplification/solutions/05-minimized-hybrid/project/TestMinimizedHybrid.csproj, experiments/Cargo.toml, experiments/DebugParser/DebugParser.csproj, experiments/debug_test.csproj, experiments/minimal-peg-rules/TestMinimalRules.csproj, go/go.mod, java/pom.xml, rust/Cargo.toml, rust/links-notation-macro/Cargo.toml, rust/links-notation/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.37
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes1/175 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes63,650
source_files_sampled175
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
7contributors
587commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
58releases
1bus factor
8open issues
crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'io.github.link-foundation:links-notation' from its registry
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'link-foundation/links-notation' from its registry
  • pypi download statistics for 'links-notation' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • Could not fetch crates package 'debug_rust' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212024-012024-112025-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 05:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioplatform-linoexperiments/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 172

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iolinks-notation-macroindirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.6indirect
crates.ionomindirect
crates.ionom8.0.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro2indirect
crates.ioquoteindirect
crates.iosynindirect
Mavencom.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin2.46.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter5.14.4indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.11.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.7indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@linksplatform/protocols-lino0.7.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.143.0indirect
npm@peggyjs/from-mem3.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node24.3.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.14.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmbun-types1.3.14indirect
npmcommander14.0.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.1indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpeggy5.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrolldown1.2.3indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-generator2.0.6indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici-types7.10.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite8.2.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.400indirect
NuGetPegasus4.1.0indirect
NuGetPlatform.Collections0.4.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesnifferindirect
PyPIblackindirect
PyPIflake8indirect
PyPIisortindirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest-timeoutindirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 157 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.7indirecthigh25.0.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, npm, PyPI.