Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 07:01 UTC

livewire / flux

The official Livewire UI component library

BladeNo license detected★ 956 stars⑂ 104 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

livewire/flux holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (11/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LivewireOrganization
984 followers19 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlivewire/fluxv2.15.01,007,3799427 days agouicomponentsfluxlaravellivewire

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 280 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year280
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year40

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 95 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 27 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count95
latest_release_tagv2.15.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release27
mean_days_between_releases16.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good
How it's scored
48.3/60Stars — 956 stars
16.8/25Forks — 104 forks
7.5/15Watchers — 23 watchers
Inputs used
forks104
stars956
watchers23
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

32At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,007,379 downloads/month across packagist
14/20Registry dependents — 125 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslivewire/flux
dependents125
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads8,343,723
monthly_downloads1,007,379
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 33 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled33
top_contributor_share0.459

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
23.3/30PR acceptance — 235/302 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs235
open_issues27
closed_issues1,499
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.982
closed_unmerged_prs67
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

91Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
21.5/25Owner reach — 984 followers of livewire
21.5/25Track record — 19 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers984
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginlivewire
public_repos19
account_age_days2,584
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 27 days ago
20/20Version history — 94 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslivewire/flux
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish27

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

26At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

6Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://fluxui.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://fluxui.dev
docs_sitehttps://fluxui.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 24 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

11Critical · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

1Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Blade without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/470 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageBlade
largest_source_bytes18,128
source_files_sampled470
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

956GitHub stars
33contributors
280commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
95releases
2bus factor
27open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 07:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 12/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/console^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/view^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^6.0|^7.0|^8.0composer.json
Packagistlivewire/livewire^3.7.4|^4.0composer.json
Packagistlaravel/prompts^0.1|^0.2|^0.3composer.json
All dependencies 7

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistilluminate/console—direct
Packagistilluminate/support—direct
Packagistilluminate/view—direct
Packagistlaravel/prompts—direct
Packagistlivewire/livewire—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistphp—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with livewire/flux. Read them side by side →

93shadcn-ui/uiA set of beautifully-designed, accessible components and a code distribution platform. Works with your favorite frameworks. Open Source. Open Code.Exceptional98Automattic/wp-calypsoThe JavaScript and API powered WordPress.comExceptional97symfony/uxSymfony UX initiative: a JavaScript ecosystem for SymfonyExceptional90Power-Components/livewire-powergrid⚡ PowerGrid generates modern, powerful and easy-to-customize data tables using Laravel Livewire.Excellent100ant-design/ant-designAn enterprise-class UI design language and React UI libraryExceptional98storybookjs/storybookStorybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.