Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 13:56 UTC

lo48576 / iri-string

String types for URIs/IRIs.

RustApache-2.0★ 29 stars⑂ 5 forkssince May 2018View on GitHub ↗

lo48576/iri-string holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (66/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

YOSHIOKA TakumaPersonal account
118 followers112 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioiri-string0.7.1417,207,5474031 days agoiriuri

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume112 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year112
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases40 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 31 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~75.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count40
latest_release_tagv0.7.14
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases75.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars29 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars29
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads17,207,547 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesiri-string
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads206,260,964
monthly_downloads17,207,547
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
18.8/30PR acceptance5/8 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues8
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.852
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.9/25Owner reach118 followers of lo48576
25/25Track record112 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers118
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlo48576
public_repos112
account_age_days5,377
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 31 days ago
20/20Version history40 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesiri-string
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish31

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

53Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/iri-string
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/iri-string
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:iri-string@0.7.14 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.1/40Legible commit history47 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.47
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, iri-string-benches/Cargo.toml, iri-string-tests/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, iri-string-benches/Cargo.toml, iri-string-tests/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/73 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes53,820
source_files_sampled73
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

29GitHub stars
5contributors
112commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
40releases
1bus factor
8open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'iri-string-tests' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'iri-string-benches' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512022-012023-122025-11
Major 0Minor 3Patch 16

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 13:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iomemchr2.4.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103Cargo.toml
crates.ioiri-stringiri-string-benches/Cargo.toml
crates.ioiri-stringiri-string-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103iri-string-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.82iri-string-tests/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 76

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iomemchr2.4.1direct
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde1.0.103direct
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.82direct
crates.ioanes0.1.4indirect
crates.ioatty0.2.6indirect
crates.ioautocfg0.1.6indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.0.0indirect
crates.iobitflags1.2.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.11.1indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if0.1.2indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.0indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.0indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.0indirect
crates.ioclap3.1.0indirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iocriterion0.4.0indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.7.4indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.8.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-queue0.2.3indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.7.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.0.0indirect
crates.iohalf1.6.0indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.8.1indirect
crates.ioindexmap1.5.2indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.0indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.51indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.4.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.8indirect
crates.iolog0.4.0indirect
crates.iomaybe-uninit2.0.0indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.5.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.14indirect
crates.ionum_cpus1.2.0indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.0indirect
crates.ioos_str_bytes6.0.0indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.1indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.0indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.23indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.3.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.7.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.1.0indirect
crates.ioredox_termios0.1.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.5.5indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.6.25indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.2.3indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.0indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.1indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.0.0indirect
crates.iosemver0.9.0indirect
crates.iosemver-parser0.7.0indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.103indirect
crates.ioserde_test1.0.104indirect
crates.iosyn1.0.67indirect
crates.iotermion1.5.0indirect
crates.iotextwrap0.14.0indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.1.0indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.0indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.3.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.74indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.74indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.74indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.74indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.74indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.51indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.3.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.1indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:iri-string@0.7.14 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.