Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 22:10 UTC

lob / lob-php

PHP Client for Lob API

PHPMIT★ 66 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Jul 2013View on GitHub ↗

lob/lob-php holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (88/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LobOrganization · verified domain
38 followers48 public repossince Jul 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlob/lob-php4.3.076,99563100 days agophprestapisdkopenapiopenapitoolsopenapi-generator

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 100 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~162.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release100
mean_days_between_releases162.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29.4/60Stars — 66 stars
11/25Forks — 22 forks
9.7/15Watchers — 57 watchers
Inputs used
forks22
stars66
watchers57
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
65.2/80Monthly downloads — 76,995 downloads/month across packagist
5.6/20Registry dependents — 6 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslob/lob-php
dependents6
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads4,408,032
monthly_downloads76,995
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

88Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 19% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 45 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled45
top_contributor_share0.191
How it's scored
32.5/42Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 142/155 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs142
open_issues7
closed_issues24
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.774
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.4/25Owner reach — 38 followers of lob
24.3/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers38
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginlob
public_repos48
account_age_days4,817

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 100 days ago
20/20Version history — 63 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslob/lob-php
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish100

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://lob.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsteam-sync
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://lob.com
docs_sitehttps://lob.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13.1/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.4.5 (high 7.2), guzzlehttp/psr7 2.4.0 (moderate 5.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
35.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,243 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories17
affected_packages4
assessed_packages71
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 71 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 78 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.804
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/216 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes51,283
source_files_sampled216
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

66GitHub stars
45contributors
1commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
13releases
6bus factor
7open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿
0Stars
22Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242112013-102019-092025-09
Major 1Minor 2Patch 7

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 22:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions^1.5 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.3composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 71

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 68 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.5direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.4.0direct
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.0.5direct
Packagistcomposer/pcre1.0.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler2.0.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations1.13.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.4.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer1.2.3indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer2.19.3indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises1.5.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.13.2indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-cs-fixer/diff1.3.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.6.1indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.15.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.15indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.5.20indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/log2.0.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher5.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem5.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder5.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver5.4.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php701.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.25.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process5.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch5.4.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.1.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.10.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 71 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.5directhigh98.0.1
phpunit/phpunit9.5.20indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/process5.4.8indirecthigh28.0.5
guzzlehttp/psr72.4.0directmoderate52.12.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.