Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 08:01 UTC

loilo / Fuse

🔍 Fuzzy search for PHP, ported from Fuse.js

PHPApache-2.0★ 363 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

loilo/Fuse holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (62/100) and lowest on Vitality (24/100). It was last updated 122 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Florian ReuschelPersonal account
93 followers79 public repossince Jul 2012OWNBIT

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistloilo/fuse7.1.175,05038546 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

24At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 122 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume2 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share0.45
days_since_last_push122
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,015 days ago
5.4/27Release cadencea release every ~579.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv7.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,015
mean_days_between_releases579.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.5/60Stars363 stars
12.7/25Forks34 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks34
stars363
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadgen.net
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65/80Monthly downloads75,050 downloads/month across packagist
8.5/20Registry dependents18 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesloilo/fuse
dependents18
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads2,086,344
monthly_downloads75,050
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 92% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.923
How it's scored
39.1/42Issue resolution93% of issues closed
22.3/30PR acceptance78/105 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs78
open_issues2
closed_issues27
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.931
closed_unmerged_prs27
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.2/25Owner reach93 followers of loilo
25/25Track record79 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers93
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginloilo
public_repos79
account_age_days5,144
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 546 days ago
20/20Version history38 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesloilo/fuse
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish546

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfuzzy-search, php, algorithm, search
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages67
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 67 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history45 of 45 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance55 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.55
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/75 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes12,249
source_files_sampled75
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

363GitHub stars
6contributors
2commits, last 12 months
122days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿
0Stars
34Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383422017-072021-112026-03
Major 2Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 08:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 67

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 67 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@prettier/plugin-php0.22.4indirect
npm@prettier/plugin-xml3.4.1indirect
npm@xml-tools/parser1.0.11indirect
npmchevrotain7.1.1indirect
npmlinguist-languages7.27.0indirect
npmphp-parser3.1.5indirect
npmprettier3.4.2indirect
npmregexp-to-ast0.5.0indirect
Packagistbrianium/paratest7.8.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.1.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.2indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest3.8.6indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin3.0.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-arch3.1.1indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-mutate3.0.5indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.46indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.50indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.5indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.8indirect
Packagistta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test0.8.7indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.1.6indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 67 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.