Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-17 21:03 UTC

lrstanley / geoip

:globe_with_meridians: Geolocation API service -- Run it yourself! | alternative to freegeoip.net

TypeScript · GoMIT★ 176 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

lrstanley/geoip holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (79/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100). It was last updated 72 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Liam StanleyPersonal account
264 followers68 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/geoipv1.1.1-2374 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

51Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 72 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push72
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 74 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~157.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv1.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release74
mean_days_between_releases157.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.4/60Stars — 176 stars
9/25Forks — 13 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars176
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges14
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgoreportcard.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
16.8/42Issue resolution — 40% of issues closed
6.5/30PR acceptance — 17/78 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues3
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.4
closed_unmerged_prs61
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.4/25Owner reach — 264 followers of lrstanley
25/25Track record — 68 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers264
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginlrstanley
public_repos68
account_age_days5,239
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 74 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/lrstanley/geoip
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish74

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://geoip.pw
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmaxmind-geoip, geoip, api, go, docker, cli, golang
has_wikino
homepagehttps://geoip.pw
docs_sitehttps://geoip.pw
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 62 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages2
assessed_packages20
unassessed_packages31
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 20 resolved dependencies against OSV. 31 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://bun.sh/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://bun.sh/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.934
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, biome.json
11/11Static type checking — web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsweb/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/50 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes8,272
source_files_sampled50
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

176GitHub stars
1contributors
15commits, last 12 months
72days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151332021-022023-092026-05
Major 1Minor 3Patch 6

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-17 21:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities62 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/httpratev0.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/chix/v2v2.0.0-beta.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/clix/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/go-bogonv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/x/syncv0.0.0-20260529065950-23013a958022go.mod
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1go.mod
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.3web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router^1.170.18web/package.json
npm@tanstack/router-plugin^1.168.23web/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1web/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1web/package.json
npmip-regex^5.0.0web/package.json
npmleaflet^1.9.4web/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.28.0web/package.json
npmofetch^1.5.1web/package.json
npmradix-ui^1.6.7web/package.json
npmrapidoc^9.3.8web/package.json
npmreact^19.2.8web/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.8web/package.json
npmreact-leaflet^5.0.0web/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7web/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0web/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3web/package.json
npmtailwindcss-animate^1.0.7web/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.14web/package.json
All dependencies 51

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 26 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/chix/v2v2.0.0-beta.5direct
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/clix/v2v2.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/go-bogonv1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/lrstanley/x/syncv0.0.0-20260529065950-23013a958022direct
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1direct
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.3.3direct
npm@tanstack/react-router^1.170.18direct
npm@tanstack/router-plugin^1.168.23direct
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1direct
npmclsx^2.1.1direct
npmip-regex^5.0.0direct
npmleaflet^1.9.4direct
npmlucide-react^1.28.0direct
npmofetch^1.5.1direct
npmradix-ui^1.6.7direct
npmrapidoc^9.3.8direct
npmreact^19.2.8direct
npmreact-dom^19.2.8direct
npmreact-leaflet^5.0.0direct
npmsonner^2.0.7direct
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0direct
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3direct
npmtailwindcss-animate^1.0.7direct
npmzustand^5.0.14direct
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/kongv1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.15indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/form/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lmittmann/tintv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
npm@biomejs/biome^2.5.6indirect
npm@hey-api/openapi-ts^0.99.0indirect
npm@hey-api/vite-plugin^0.3.2indirect
npm@playwright/test^1.62.1indirect
npm@types/leaflet^1.9.22indirect
npm@types/node^25.9.5indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.18indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.4indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react^6.0.5indirect
npmtypescript~6.0.3indirect
npmvite^8.2.0indirect
npmvite-plugin-biome^1.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 20 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 31 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirectunknown10.41.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.