Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 17:49 UTC

m-vo / contao-group-widget

Group widget for repeating sets of DCA fields

PHPNo license detected★ 26 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Jan 2021View on GitHub ↗

m-vo/contao-group-widget holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

M. VondanoPersonal account

30 followers53 public repossince Aug 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	mvo/contao-group-widget	v1.6.2	3,552	40	220 days ago	group multi repeat widget contao dca

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

61Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18	Commit volume — 34 commits in the last year
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

commits_last_year	34
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~81.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	41
latest_release_tag	v1.7.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	81.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk

How it's scored

22.7/60	Stars — 26 stars
8.7/25	Forks — 12 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	12
stars	26
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate

How it's scored

47.3/80	Monthly downloads — 3,552 downloads/month across packagist
9.4/20	Registry dependents — 25 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	mvo/contao-group-widget
dependents	25
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	149,663
monthly_downloads	3,552
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 83% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	12
top_contributor_share	0.828

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent

How it's scored

29.1/42	Issue resolution — 69% of issues closed
29.3/30	PR acceptance — 43/44 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

merged_prs	43
open_issues	12
closed_issues	27
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.692
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.7/25	Owner reach — 30 followers of m-vo
24.6/25	Track record — 53 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	30
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	m-vo
public_repos	53
account_age_days	4,760

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 220 days ago
20/20	Version history — 40 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	mvo/contao-group-widget
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	220

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
6/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5	Code-Review — Found 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
4.5/7.5	Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	3.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	20
affected_packages	11
assessed_packages	190
unassessed_packages	17
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 7, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 190 resolved dependencies against OSV. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

18Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.6/40	Legible commit history — 33 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.33
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/43 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	47,080
source_files_sampled	43
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

26GitHub stars

12contributors

34commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

41releases

1bus factor

12open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿

0Stars

12Forks

24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 21

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10

3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 17:49 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3	CI-Tests	3 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8	Code-Review	Found 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10	Contributors	project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
6	Maintained	7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 13

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	contao/core-bundle	`^5.3.51 \|\| ^6.0`	composer.json
Packagist	twig/twig	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/collections	`^2.1`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`^3.0 \|\| ^4.3`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/inflector	`^1.4 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	doctrine/orm	`^2.6 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/container	`^1.0 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/config	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.4 \|\| ^8.1`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.4 \|\| ^8.1`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/property-access	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.4 \|\| ^8.1`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.4 \|\| ^8.1`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`^6.4 \|\| ^7.4 \|\| ^8.1`	composer.json
npm	prettier	`^3.6.2`	package.json

All dependencies 207

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	prettier	`3.6.2`	direct
Packagist	contao/core-bundle	`—`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/collections	`—`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`—`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/inflector	`—`	direct
Packagist	doctrine/orm	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/container	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	direct
Packagist	symfony/config	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/http-foundation	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/http-kernel	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/property-access	`—`	direct
Packagist	twig/twig	`—`	direct
npm	@hotwired/stimulus	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-node-resolve	`16.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/plugin-terser	`0.4.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/pluginutils	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	@trysound/sax	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/resolve	`1.20.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.8.23`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.27.0`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	caniuse-api	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001752`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	colord	`2.9.3`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	commander	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	concat-with-sourcemaps	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	css-declaration-sorter	`6.4.1`	indirect
npm	css-select	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	css-tree	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	cssnano	`5.1.15`	indirect
npm	cssnano-preset-default	`5.2.14`	indirect
npm	cssnano-utils	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	csso	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	domutils	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.244`	indirect
npm	entities	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	eventemitter3	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	generic-names	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	icss-replace-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	icss-utils	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	import-cwd	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	import-from	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	is-module	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	loader-utils	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.camelcase	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.memoize	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.uniq	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.0.14`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.27`	indirect
npm	normalize-url	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	p-finally	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-queue	`6.6.2`	indirect
npm	p-timeout	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	pify	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect
npm	postcss-calc	`8.2.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-colormin	`5.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-convert-values	`5.1.3`	indirect
npm	postcss-discard-comments	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	postcss-discard-duplicates	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-discard-empty	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-discard-overridden	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-import	`16.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-load-config	`3.1.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-merge-longhand	`5.1.7`	indirect
npm	postcss-merge-rules	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-minify-font-values	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-minify-gradients	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-minify-params	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-minify-selectors	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-modules	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-modules-extract-imports	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-modules-local-by-default	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-modules-scope	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-modules-values	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-charset	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-display-values	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-positions	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-repeat-style	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-string	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-timing-functions	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-unicode	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-url	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-normalize-whitespace	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-ordered-values	`5.1.3`	indirect
npm	postcss-reduce-initial	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	postcss-reduce-transforms	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.1.2`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-svgo	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-unique-selectors	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	promise.series	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	randombytes	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	read-cache	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.11`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`2.79.2`	indirect
npm	rollup-plugin-postcss	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	rollup-pluginutils	`2.8.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safe-identifier	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	serialize-javascript	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	smob	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	stable	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	string-hash	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	style-inject	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	stylehacks	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	svgo	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.44.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yaml	`1.10.2`	indirect
Packagist	bamarni/composer-bin-plugin	`—`	indirect
Packagist	clue/ndjson-react	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	contao/easy-coding-standard	`6.13.8`	indirect
Packagist	contao/manager-plugin	`—`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	evenement/evenement	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.94.0`	indirect
Packagist	kubawerlos/php-cs-fixer-custom-fixers	`3.36.0`	indirect
Packagist	maglnet/composer-require-checker	`3.8.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.19.5`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	react/cache	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/child-process	`0.6.7`	indirect
Packagist	react/dns	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/event-loop	`1.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/promise	`3.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/socket	`1.17.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/stream	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`5.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.27.1`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/cache	`—`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`5.4.47`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.32`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`6.4.32`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`6.4.30`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`6.4.33`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`6.4.30`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php73	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`6.4.33`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`6.4.24`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`6.4.30`	indirect
Packagist	symplify/easy-coding-standard	`13.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.12.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/glob	`4.7.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 190 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
rollup	`2.79.2`	indirect	critical	1	`4.59.0`
browserslist	`4.27.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.28.7`
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`4.0.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.5.6`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
serialize-javascript	`6.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`7.0.5`
squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.2`
svgo	`2.8.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.2`
postcss-selector-parser	`6.1.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.1.3`
postcss-selector-parser	`7.1.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.1.3`
yaml	`1.10.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.8.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records