Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 13:18 UTC

mahdyar / ansi-html-community

An elegant lib that converts the chalked text to HTML.

JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 1 forksince Sep 2021forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

mahdyar/ansi-html-community holds a health index of 24 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (50/100) and lowest on Vitality (13/100). It was last updated 1355 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

24
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

24
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 34 is calibrated to 28 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MahdyarPersonal account
111 followers15 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmansi-html-community0.0.874,048,51311819 days agoansiansi-htmlchalk-html

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

13Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,355 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.861
days_since_last_push1,355
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,819 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.0.8
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,819
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars21 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars21
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, travis-ci.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads74,048,513 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesansi-html-community
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads74,048,513
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

38Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 77% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.767
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
13.8/30PR acceptance6/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.7/25Owner reach111 followers of mahdyar
20.8/25Track record15 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers111
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmahdyar
public_repos15
account_age_days3,690
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,819 days ago
4/20Version history1 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesansi-html-community
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,819

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpackage.json ("standard")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://npmjs.com/package/ansi-html-community
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsansi-html, ansi-html-community
has_wikino
homepagehttps://npmjs.com/package/ansi-html-community
docs_sitehttps://npmjs.com/package/ansi-html-community
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories37
affected_packages12
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 10, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12/40Legible commit history7 of 31 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.226
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpackage.json ("standard")
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 36
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 36 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.139
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/5 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes4,902
source_files_sampled5
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

21GitHub stars
4contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,355days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-29 13:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 95 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@ungap/promise-all-settled1.1.2indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex2.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles2.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai4.3.7indirect
npmchalk1.1.3indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql4.1.2indirect
npmdiff5.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas-ansi2.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash2.4.2indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmloupe2.3.1indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmminimatch5.0.1indirect
npmmocha10.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.3indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi3.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color2.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtype-detect4.0.8indirect
npmworkerpool6.2.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.4indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lodash2.4.2indirectcritical54.18.0
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
braces3.0.2indirecthigh13.0.3
get-func-name2.0.0indirecthigh12.0.1
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh44.3.1
minimatch3.0.4indirecthigh410.2.3
minimatch5.0.1indirecthigh310.2.3
nanoid3.3.3indirecthigh35.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
serialize-javascript6.0.0indirecthigh37.0.5
diff5.0.0indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.