Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 13:11 UTC

malware-dev / MDK-SE

Malware's Development Kit for SE

C#MIT★ 1,044 stars⑂ 123 forkssince Jul 2017archivedView on GitHub ↗

malware-dev/MDK-SE holds a health index of 14 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on Vitality (23/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

14
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

14
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MalwarePersonal account
199 followers13 public repossince Jun 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

23At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 221 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push221
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases65 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 856 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~102.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count65
latest_release_tag1.5.19
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release856
mean_days_between_releases102.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49/60Stars1,044 stars
17.4/25Forks123 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks123
stars1,044
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.767
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.5/30PR acceptance29/37 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues0
closed_issues285
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.5/25Owner reach199 followers of malware-dev
20.3/25Track record13 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers199
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmalware-dev
public_repos13
account_age_days4,792
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

28At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsspace-engineers, mdk, ingame-script, mdk-se, malware-development-kit, programmable-block, game
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

28At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.6/40Legible commit history13 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.143
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapSource/DevSetup/DevSetup/DevSetup.csproj, Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj, Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsSource/DevSetup/DevSetup/DevSetup.csproj, Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj, Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj, Source/ExtensionClass/ExtensionClass.csproj, Source/IngameScriptTemplate/IngameScriptTemplate.csproj, Source/IngameScriptTemplate/ProjectTemplate.csproj, Source/MDK/MDK.csproj, Source/MDKAnalyzer/MDKAnalyzer.Test/MDKAnalyzer.Test.csproj, Source/MDKAnalyzer/MDKAnalyzer.Vsix/MDKAnalyzer.Vsix.csproj, Source/MDKAnalyzer/MDKAnalyzer.csproj, Source/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy.csproj, Source/MDKListenerPlugin/MDKListenerPlugin.csproj, Source/MDKListenerPlugin/TestApp/TestApp.csproj, Source/MDKServices/MDKServices.csproj, Source/MDKUtilities/MDKUtilities.csproj, Source/MDKWhitelistExtractor/MDKWhitelistExtractor.csproj, Source/MixinProjectTemplate/MixinProjectTemplate.csproj, Source/Publish/Publish.csproj, Source/ReadMe/ReadMe.csproj, Source/UtilityClass/UtilityClass.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/316 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes1,066,450
source_files_sampled316
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,044GitHub stars
13contributors
1commits, last 12 months
221days since last push
65releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'MDKAnalyzer' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 123 ⇿
0Stars
123Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512332017-082021-102025-12
Major 0Minor 0Patch 47

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.8 / 10
2.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 13:11 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetprotobuf-net3.0.0-alpha.43Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj
NuGetSystem.Private.ServiceModel4.5.3Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reflection.DispatchProxy4.5.1Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Principal.Windows4.5.1Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj
NuGetSystem.ServiceModel.Primitives4.5.3Source/DocGen/DocGen.csproj
NuGetDirectXTexNet1.0.1Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2020.3.0Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetprotobuf-net3.0.73Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable5.0.0Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetSystem.Private.ServiceModel4.8.0Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reflection.DispatchProxy4.7.1Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetSystem.Security.Principal.Windows5.0.0Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetSystem.ServiceModel.Primitives4.8.0Source/DocGen2/DocGen2.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2022.3.1Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.5.0Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild4.5.0Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Interop17.5.33428.366Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK17.5.33428.388Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VSSDK.BuildTools17.5.4074Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetOokii.Dialogs.Wpf5.0.1Source/MDK/MDK.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces4.5.0Source/MDKAnalyzer/MDKAnalyzer.csproj
NuGetNETStandard.LibrarySource/MDKAnalyzer/MDKAnalyzer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers2.6.0Source/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp2.7.0Source/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy/MDKAnalyzer_Legacy.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2022.3.1Source/MDKServices/MDKServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK17.5.33428.388Source/MDKServices/MDKServices.csproj
NuGetprotobuf-net3.1.33Source/MDKWhitelistExtractor/MDKWhitelistExtractor.csproj
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.