Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-15 13:08 UTC

managedcode / Communication

Result pattern for .NET that replaces exceptions with type-safe return values. Features railway-oriented programming, ASP.NET Core integration, RFC 7807 Problem Details, and built-in pagination. Designed for production systems requiring explicit error handling without the overhead of throwing exceptions.

C#MIT★ 95 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#exeption-handling#requests#result#results#cqrs#cqrs-framework#dotnet#dotnet-core#independent#result-pattern#result-type#sse#sse-client#sse-streaming

managedcode/Communication holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Managed CodeOrganization
133 followers53 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetManagedCode.Communication10.1.0-640 days agomanagedcodecommunicationresult
NuGetManagedCode.Communication.Orleans10.1.0-400 days agomanagedcodecommunicationresult
NuGetManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore10.1.0-120 days agoaspnetcoreasp.netwebapisignalrresult-patternerror-handlingexception-filtermodel-validationmiddlewarehttprestapimanagedcodeproblem-detailsrfc7807
NuGetManagedCode.Communication.Extensions10.1.0-200 days agomanagedcodecommunicationresult-patternrailway-orientedroppolly

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume — 49 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year49
human_commit_share0.78
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~40.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv10.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases40.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

32At Risk
How it's scored
32/60Stars — 95 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars95
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good
How it's scored
57.1/80Total downloads — 310,969 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.Communication, ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans, ManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore, ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads310,969
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.822

Issue & PR responsiveness

50Moderate
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
8.4/30PR acceptance — 38/135 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs38
open_issues2
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs97
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

86Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
15.3/25Owner reach — 133 followers of managedcode
23.7/25Track record — 53 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers133
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginmanagedcode
public_repos53
account_age_days2,023
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.Communication, ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans, ManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore, ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsexeption-handling, requests, result, results, cqrs, cqrs-framework, dotnet, dotnet-core, independent, result-pattern, result-type, sse, sse-client, sse-streaming
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.3/40Legible commit history — 15 of 78 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.192
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,854

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — ManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore/ManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark/ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions/ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 22 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifestsManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore/ManagedCode.Communication.AspNetCore.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark/ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions/ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans/ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj, ManagedCode.Communication/ManagedCode.Communication.csproj, tmpSample/tmpSample.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.22

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/289 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes29,836
source_files_sampled289
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

95GitHub stars
7contributors
49commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212025-082025-082025-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-15 13:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark/ManagedCode.Communication.Benchmark.csproj
NuGetPolly8.7.0ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions/ManagedCode.Communication.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Sdk10.2.2ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans/ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Runtime10.2.2ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans/ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Serialization.Abstractions10.2.2ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans/ManagedCode.Communication.Orleans.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.TestingHost10.2.2ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetShouldly4.3.0ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Client10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild10.0.1ManagedCode.Communication.Tests/ManagedCode.Communication.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication/ManagedCode.Communication.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication/ManagedCode.Communication.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.11ManagedCode.Communication/ManagedCode.Communication.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.msbuild10.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Client10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Runtime10.2.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Sdk10.2.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.Serialization.Abstractions10.2.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Orleans.TestingHost10.2.2direct
NuGetPolly8.7.0direct
NuGetShouldly4.3.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with managedcode/Communication. Read them side by side →

95bitwarden/serverBitwarden infrastructure/backend (API, database, Docker, etc).Exceptional96reactiveui/refitThe automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, Refit turns your REST API into a live interface.Exceptional94dotnet/dev-proxySimulate API failures, throttling, and chaos — all from your command line.Exceptional99axios/axiosPromise based HTTP client for the browser and node.jsExceptional98microsoft/kiotaOpenAPI based HTTP Client code generatorExceptional96expressjs/expressFast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for node.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.