Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 16:11 UTC

managedcode / markitdown

C# tool for converting files and office documents to Markdown.

C# · HTMLMIT★ 80 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Sep 2025forkView on GitHub ↗

managedcode/markitdown holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated 46 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Managed CodeOrganization · verified domain
138 followers58 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetManagedCode.MarkItDown10.0.8-1546 days agomanagedcodemarkitdownmarkdownconverterpdfdocxxlsxpptxhtmlllmdotnetasync

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 46 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume — 25 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share0.68
days_since_last_push46
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 46 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~34.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv10.0.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release46
mean_days_between_releases34.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.8/60Stars — 80 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars80
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.7/80Total downloads — 39,236 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.MarkItDown
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads39,236
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 27% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 74 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled74
top_contributor_share0.266
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
22.9/30PR acceptance — 13/17 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs13
open_issues1
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.4/25Owner reach — 138 followers of managedcode
24.3/25Track record — 58 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers138
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmanagedcode
public_repos58
account_age_days2,090

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 46 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.MarkItDown
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish46

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, docs/templates/AGENTS.md, docs/templates/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
19.6/40Legible commit history — 25 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.368
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, docs/templates/AGENTS.md, docs/templates/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,567
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj, src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestssrc/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj, src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Tests/MarkItDown.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/205 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes84,399
source_files_sampled205
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

80GitHub stars
74contributors
25commits, last 12 months
46days since last push
15releases
3bus factor
1open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512025-102026-022026-06
Major 1Minor 0Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 16:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSpectre.Console—src/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj
NuGetAngleSharp—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.Rekognition—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.S3—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.Textract—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.TranscribeService—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.DocumentAI.V1—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Speech.V1—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Vision.V1—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.MimeTypes—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Aws—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Core—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.FileSystem—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Gcp—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Azure—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSep—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.AI.FormRecognizer—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.AI.Vision.ImageAnalysis—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identity—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetPdfPig—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetPDFtoImage—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux.NoDependencies—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMimeKit—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetYoutubeExplode—src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAngleSharp—direct
NuGetAWSSDK.Rekognition—direct
NuGetAWSSDK.S3—direct
NuGetAWSSDK.Textract—direct
NuGetAWSSDK.TranscribeService—direct
NuGetAzure.AI.FormRecognizer—direct
NuGetAzure.AI.Vision.ImageAnalysis—direct
NuGetAzure.Identity—direct
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml—direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.DocumentAI.V1—direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Speech.V1—direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Vision.V1—direct
NuGetManagedCode.MimeTypes—direct
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Aws—direct
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Azure—direct
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Core—direct
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.FileSystem—direct
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Gcp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options—direct
NuGetMimeKit—direct
NuGetPdfPig—direct
NuGetPDFtoImage—direct
NuGetSep—direct
NuGetSkiaSharp—direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux.NoDependencies—direct
NuGetSpectre.Console—direct
NuGetYoutubeExplode—direct
NuGetAzure.AI.OpenAI—indirect
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs—indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—indirect
NuGetMoq—indirect
NuGetShouldly—indirect
NuGetTestcontainers.Azurite—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.