Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 11:02 UTC

managedcode / markitdown

C# tool for converting files and office documents to Markdown.

C# · HTMLMIT★ 78 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Sep 2025forkView on GitHub ↗

managedcode/markitdown holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Managed CodeOrganization · verified domain
136 followers54 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetManagedCode.MarkItDown10.0.8-150 days agomanagedcodemarkitdownmarkdownconverterpdfdocxxlsxpptxhtmlllmdotnetasync

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
17.9/18Commit volume98 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year98
human_commit_share0.68
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~34.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv10.0.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases34.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.6/60Stars78 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars78
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47/80Total downloads33,407 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.MarkItDown
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads33,407
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 27% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth74 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled74
top_contributor_share0.266
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
22.9/30PR acceptance13/17 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs13
open_issues1
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.4/25Owner reach136 followers of managedcode
23.9/25Track record54 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers136
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmanagedcode
public_repos54
account_age_days2,044

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history15 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesManagedCode.MarkItDown
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, docs/templates/AGENTS.md, docs/templates/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
19.6/40Legible commit history25 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.368
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, docs/templates/AGENTS.md, docs/templates/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,567
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj, src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestssrc/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj, src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests/MarkItDown.Cli.Tests.csproj, tests/MarkItDown.Tests/MarkItDown.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes1/205 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes84,399
source_files_sampled205
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesnotebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

78GitHub stars
74contributors
98commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
3bus factor
1open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512025-102026-022026-06
Major 1Minor 0Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 11:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSpectre.Consolesrc/MarkItDown.Cli/MarkItDown.Cli.csproj
NuGetAngleSharpsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.Rekognitionsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.S3src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.Textractsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.TranscribeServicesrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.DocumentAI.V1src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Speech.V1src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Vision.V1src/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.MimeTypessrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Awssrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Coresrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.FileSystemsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Gcpsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Azuresrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSepsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AIsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.AI.FormRecognizersrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.AI.Vision.ImageAnalysissrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identitysrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionssrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionssrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionssrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetPdfPigsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetPDFtoImagesrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXmlsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharpsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux.NoDependenciessrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetMimeKitsrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
NuGetYoutubeExplodesrc/MarkItDown/MarkItDown.csproj
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAngleSharpdirect
NuGetAWSSDK.Rekognitiondirect
NuGetAWSSDK.S3direct
NuGetAWSSDK.Textractdirect
NuGetAWSSDK.TranscribeServicedirect
NuGetAzure.AI.FormRecognizerdirect
NuGetAzure.AI.Vision.ImageAnalysisdirect
NuGetAzure.Identitydirect
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXmldirect
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.DocumentAI.V1direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Speech.V1direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Vision.V1direct
NuGetManagedCode.MimeTypesdirect
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Awsdirect
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Azuredirect
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Coredirect
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.FileSystemdirect
NuGetManagedCode.Storage.Gcpdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AIdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionsdirect
NuGetMimeKitdirect
NuGetPdfPigdirect
NuGetPDFtoImagedirect
NuGetSepdirect
NuGetSkiaSharpdirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux.NoDependenciesdirect
NuGetSpectre.Consoledirect
NuGetYoutubeExplodedirect
NuGetAzure.AI.OpenAIindirect
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobsindirect
NuGetcoverlet.collectorindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAIindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMoqindirect
NuGetShouldlyindirect
NuGetTestcontainers.Azuriteindirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.