Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 20:35 UTC

manishiitg / llm-provider-mcp

Local MCP server for delegating asynchronous coding jobs between Claude Code, Codex, Cursor Agent, and Pi.

GoMIT★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

manishiitg/llm-provider-mcp holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ManishPersonal account
85 followers46 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/manishiitg/multi-llm-provider-gopoints to another repo — not scoredv0.7.3-3956 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 707 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year707
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year38
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.7.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases1.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 29/32 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach — 85 followers of manishiitg
24.2/25Track record — 46 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers85
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmanishiitg
public_repos46
account_age_days5,343
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/manishiitg/llm-provider-mcp#readme
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, claude-code, codex-cli, coding-agents, cursor, developer-tools, golang, mcp, model-context-protocol, pi-cli, tmux
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/manishiitg/llm-provider-mcp#readme
docs_sitehttps://github.com/manishiitg/llm-provider-mcp#readme
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
1.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages4
assessed_packages107
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 107 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.1/40Legible commit history — 67 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.677
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 56 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.56
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 13/596 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes173,967
source_files_sampled596
oversized_source_files13
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
707commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • go package 'github.com/manishiitg/multi-llm-provider-go' points at a different repository (https://github.com/manishiitg/multi-llm-provider-go); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 20:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
3Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocharm.land/huh/v2v2.0.3go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.18.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.43.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/bedrockruntimev1.50.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.45.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.36.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkoukk/tiktoken-gov0.1.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.57.0go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.49.1go.mod
All dependencies 107

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 93 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocharm.land/huh/v2v2.0.3direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.18.2direct
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.43.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/bedrockruntimev1.50.6direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.45.0direct
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.36.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkoukk/tiktoken-gov0.1.8direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.57.0direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.49.1direct
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.2indirect
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.0.11indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.17indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.35.21indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bahlo/generic-list-gov0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/catppuccin/gov0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/ultravioletv0.0.0-20260205113103-524a6607adb8indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.6indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/orderedv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/stringsv0.0.0-20240722160745-212f7b056ed0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termiosv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/windowsv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2v1.11.5indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.11indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/invopop/jsonschemav0.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/hashstructure/v2v2.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.1-0.20240121214520-5f936abd7ae8indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/standard-webhooks/standard-webhooks/librariesv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/matchv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/prettyv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/sjsonv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2v2.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.64.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260410095643-746e56fc9e2findirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaaindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.72.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 107 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirecthigh11.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirectunknown11.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.