Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 14:14 UTC

maplibre / maplibre-gl-leaflet

This is a binding from MapLibre GL JS to the familiar Leaflet API.

JavaScript · HTMLISC★ 225 stars⑂ 49 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗

maplibre/maplibre-gl-leaflet holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (88/100) and lowest on Vitality (36/100). It was last updated 32 days ago. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MapLibreOrganization · verified domain
1,932 followers58 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@maplibre/maplibre-gl-leaflet0.1.4334,6371532 days agomaplibreglleafletleafletjsmaps

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 32 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume3 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push32
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases8 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 416 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~134.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.1.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release416
mean_days_between_releases134.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.1/60Stars225 stars
14/25Forks49 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks49
stars225
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (ISC)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
73.7/80Monthly downloads334,637 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@maplibre/maplibre-gl-leaflet
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads334,637
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

88Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 25% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth50 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled50
top_contributor_share0.253
How it's scored
27/42Issue resolution64% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance42/47 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues16
closed_issues29
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.644
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
23.6/25Owner reach1,932 followers of maplibre
24.4/25Track record58 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,932
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmaplibre
public_repos58
account_age_days2,109

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 32 days ago
20/20Version history15 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@maplibre/maplibre-gl-leaflet
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish32

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories14
affected_packages5
assessed_packages74
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 74 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.5/40Legible commit history55 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.591
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtest/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstest/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (test/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/5 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes15,385
source_files_sampled5
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

225GitHub stars
50contributors
3commits, last 12 months
32days since last push
8releases
5bus factor
16open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 49 ⇿
0Stars
49Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504722021-052024-012026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 6

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 14:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests2 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@mapbox/jsonlint-lines-primitives2.0.3indirect
npm@mapbox/point-geometry1.1.0indirect
npm@mapbox/tiny-sdf2.2.0indirect
npm@mapbox/unitbezier1.0.0indirect
npm@mapbox/vector-tile3.0.0indirect
npm@maplibre/geojson-vt6.1.1indirect
npm@maplibre/maplibre-gl-style-spec26.2.1indirect
npm@maplibre/mlt1.1.12indirect
npm@maplibre/vt-pbf4.3.2indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.144.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/geojson7946.0.16indirect
npm@types/leaflet1.9.20indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.12indirect
npmcli1.0.1indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconsole-browserify1.1.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmdate-now0.1.4indirect
npmdom-serializer0.2.2indirect
npmdomelementtype1.3.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler2.3.0indirect
npmdomutils1.5.1indirect
npmearcut3.2.3indirect
npmentities1.0.0indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmexit0.1.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmgl-matrix3.4.4indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmhtmlparser23.8.3indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmisarray0.0.1indirect
npmjshint2.13.6indirect
npmjson-stringify-pretty-compact4.0.0indirect
npmkdbush4.1.0indirect
npmleaflet1.9.4indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmmaplibre-gl6.3.0indirect
npmminimatch3.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmurmurhash-js1.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpbf5.1.2indirect
npmpotpack2.1.0indirect
npmprotocol-buffers-schema3.6.1indirect
npmquickselect3.0.0indirect
npmreadable-stream1.1.14indirect
npmresolve-protobuf-schema2.1.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.4indirect
npmstring_decoder0.10.31indirect
npmstrip-json-comments1.0.4indirect
npmtinyqueue3.0.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 74 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
maplibre-gl6.3.0indirectcritical16.4.1
brace-expansion1.1.12indirecthigh45.0.9
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch3.0.8indirecthigh310.2.3
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.