Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 12:53 UTC

matter-labs / vise

Tools to define and export metrics in Rust libraries and apps

RustApache-2.0★ 11 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

matter-labs/vise holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (64/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Matter LabsOrganization
4,887 followers232 public repossince Aug 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume4 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 392 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~23.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release392
mean_days_between_releases23.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars11 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars11
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 67% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.667
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
23.3/30PR acceptance38/49 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs38
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach4,887 followers of matter-labs
25/25Track record232 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,887
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginmatter-labs
public_repos232
account_age_days2,890
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmetrics, metrics-exporter, prometheus-exporter
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
1/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/54 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes23,085
source_files_sampled54
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

11GitHub stars
9contributors
4commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'vise-e2e-tests' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 12:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2CI-Tests7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
2SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iovisee2e-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iovise-exportere2e-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iorande2e-tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioe2e-tests/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 208 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iorand0.9.5direct
crates.iotokio1.49.0direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103indirect
crates.ioassert_matches1.5.0indirect
crates.ioatomic-waker1.1.2indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.10.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.1indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.52indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocompile-fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.10.0indirect
crates.iocore-foundation0.9.4indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.ioctor0.2.9indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.ioderive_more2.1.1indirect
crates.ioderive_more-impl2.1.1indirect
crates.iodisplaydoc0.2.5indirect
crates.iodoc-comment0.3.4indirect
crates.iodtoa1.0.11indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.ioelsa1.11.2indirect
crates.ioenum-as-inner0.6.1indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.7indirect
crates.ioforeign-types0.3.2indirect
crates.ioforeign-types-shared0.1.1indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.2indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohttp1.4.0indirect
crates.iohttp-body1.0.1indirect
crates.iohttp-body-util0.1.3indirect
crates.iohttparse1.10.1indirect
crates.iohttpdate1.0.3indirect
crates.iohyper1.8.1indirect
crates.iohyper-tls0.6.0indirect
crates.iohyper-util0.1.19indirect
crates.ioicu_collections2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_locale_core2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_normalizer_data2.1.1indirect
crates.ioicu_properties2.1.2indirect
crates.ioicu_properties_data2.1.2indirect
crates.ioicu_provider2.1.1indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioidna1.1.0indirect
crates.ioidna_adapter1.2.1indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.13.0indirect
crates.ioipnet2.11.0indirect
crates.ioiri-string0.7.10indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.85indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.180indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.11.0indirect
crates.iolitemap0.8.1indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.6indirect
crates.iomime0.3.17indirect
crates.iomio1.1.1indirect
crates.ionative-tls0.2.14indirect
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.2indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.ioopenssl0.10.75indirect
crates.ioopenssl-macros0.1.1indirect
crates.ioopenssl-probe0.1.6indirect
crates.ioopenssl-sys0.9.111indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.32indirect
crates.iopotential_utf0.1.4indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.0indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.iopredicates2.1.5indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.9indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.105indirect
crates.ioprometheus-client0.23.1indirect
crates.ioprometheus-client-derive-encode0.4.2indirect
crates.ioprometheus-http-query0.8.3indirect
crates.iopulldown-cmark0.9.6indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.43indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.2indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.13indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.8indirect
crates.ioreqwest0.12.28indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.3indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.13.2indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.22indirect
crates.ioschannel0.1.28indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework2.11.1indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework-sys2.15.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.27indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.9indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.0.4indirect
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1indirect
crates.iosharded-slab0.1.7indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.11indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.1indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.114indirect
crates.iosync_wrapper1.0.2indirect
crates.iosynstructure0.13.2indirect
crates.iotarget-triple1.0.0indirect
crates.iotempfile3.24.0indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.4.1indirect
crates.iothread_local1.1.9indirect
crates.iotime0.3.53indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.9indirect
crates.iotime-macros0.2.31indirect
crates.iotinystr0.8.2indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.6.0indirect
crates.iotokio-native-tls0.3.1indirect
crates.iotoml0.7.8indirect
crates.iotoml0.9.11+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.11indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.7.5+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.19.15indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.0.6+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.0.6+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotower0.5.3indirect
crates.iotower-http0.6.8indirect
crates.iotower-layer0.3.3indirect
crates.iotower-service0.3.3indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.44indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-capture0.1.0indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iotracing-log0.2.0indirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3.22indirect
crates.iotracing-tunnel0.1.0indirect
crates.iotry-lock0.2.5indirect
crates.iotrybuild1.0.114indirect
crates.iounicase2.9.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.22indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.12.0indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.iourl2.5.8indirect
crates.ioutf8_iter1.0.4indirect
crates.iovaluable0.1.1indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.ioversion-sync0.9.5indirect
crates.iowant0.3.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.1+wasi-0.2.4indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futures0.4.58indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.108indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.85indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowinnow0.5.40indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.14indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.46.0indirect
crates.iowriteable0.6.2indirect
crates.ioyoke0.8.1indirect
crates.ioyoke-derive0.8.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.28indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.28indirect
crates.iozerofrom0.1.6indirect
crates.iozerofrom-derive0.1.6indirect
crates.iozeroize1.8.2indirect
crates.iozerotrie0.2.3indirect
crates.iozerovec0.11.5indirect
crates.iozerovec-derive0.11.2indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.14indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.