Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 15:28 UTC

mautrix / telegram

A Matrix-Telegram puppeting bridge

GoAGPL-3.0★ 1,712 stars⑂ 243 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗

#matrix-org #matrix-appservice #telegram #telegram-client #matrix #bridge #go #golang #gotd

mautrix/telegram holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mautrixOrganization

600 followers30 public repossince Aug 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	go.mau.fi/mautrix-telegram	v0.2607.0	-	74	5 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.8/36	Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 381 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	381
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	43

Release discipline

76Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 73 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~124 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	73
latest_release_tag	v0.2607.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	5
mean_days_between_releases	124

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent

How it's scored

52.4/60	Stars — 1,712 stars
19.9/25	Forks — 243 forks
8/15	Watchers — 28 watchers

Inputs used

forks	243
stars	1,712
watchers	28
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 45 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	45
top_contributor_share	0.822

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

39.2/42	Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
19.5/30	PR acceptance — 113/174 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	113
open_issues	60
closed_issues	841
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.933
closed_unmerged_prs	61
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

88Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20/25	Owner reach — 600 followers of mautrix
20.8/25	Track record — 30 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	600
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	mautrix
public_repos	30
account_age_days	1,810

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20	Version history — 74 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	go.mau.fi/mautrix-telegram
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://go.mau.fi/mautrix-telegram/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 9 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	matrix-org, matrix-appservice, telegram, telegram-client, matrix, bridge, go, golang, gotd
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://go.mau.fi/mautrix-telegram/
docs_site	https://go.mau.fi/mautrix-telegram/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5	Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	65
unassessed_packages	25
affected_by_severity	unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 65 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — pkg/gotd/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	pkg/gotd/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 34/3,572 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	893,963
source_files_sampled	3,572
oversized_source_files	34

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,712GitHub stars

45contributors

381commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

73releases

1bus factor

60open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 1,712 ★ / 243 ⇿

1,712Stars

243Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10

4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 15:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
10	Fuzzing	project is fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 32

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4	`v4.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.15`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-faster/errors	`v0.7.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-faster/jx	`v1.2.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-faster/xor	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-openapi/inflect	`v0.21.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gotd/getdoc	`v0.51.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gotd/ige	`v0.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gotd/neo	`v0.1.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gotd/tl	`v0.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/k0kubun/pp/v3	`v3.5.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.19.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.15.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rs/zerolog	`v1.35.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tidwall/gjson	`v1.19.0`	go.mod
Go	go.mau.fi/util	`v0.9.12-0.20260719092501-f9c03d846391`	go.mod
Go	go.mau.fi/webp	`v0.3.0`	go.mod
Go	go.mau.fi/zerozap	`v0.1.2`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.11.0`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/multierr	`v1.11.0`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/zap	`v1.28.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20260709172345-9ea1abe57597`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.44.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	maunium.net/go/mautrix	`v0.29.1-0.20260719130752-5743d9b6f27e`	go.mod
Go	rsc.io/qr	`v0.2.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 90

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 32 direct and 58 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4	`v4.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.15`	direct
Go	github.com/go-faster/errors	`v0.7.1`	direct
Go	github.com/go-faster/jx	`v1.2.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-faster/xor	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-openapi/inflect	`v0.21.5`	direct
Go	github.com/gotd/getdoc	`v0.51.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gotd/ige	`v0.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/gotd/neo	`v0.1.5`	direct
Go	github.com/gotd/tl	`v0.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/k0kubun/pp/v3	`v3.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.19.0`	direct
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.15.0`	direct
Go	github.com/rs/zerolog	`v1.35.1`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/tidwall/gjson	`v1.19.0`	direct
Go	go.mau.fi/util	`v0.9.12-0.20260719092501-f9c03d846391`	direct
Go	go.mau.fi/webp	`v0.3.0`	direct
Go	go.mau.fi/zerozap	`v0.1.2`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.11.0`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/multierr	`v1.11.0`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/zap	`v1.28.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20260709172345-9ea1abe57597`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.44.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	maunium.net/go/mautrix	`v0.29.1-0.20260719130752-5743d9b6f27e`	direct
Go	rsc.io/qr	`v0.2.0`	direct
Go	filippo.io/edwards25519	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/andybalholm/cascadia	`v1.3.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/benbjohnson/clock	`v1.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22	`v22.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-faster/sdk	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kr/pretty	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/lib/pq	`v1.12.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.15`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3	`v1.14.48`	indirect
Go	github.com/petermattis/goid	`v0.0.0-20260713124913-97594f28f5ca`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/puerkitobio/goquery	`v1.10.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/rs/xid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/segmentio/asm	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/sergi/go-diff	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/skip2/go-qrcode	`v0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686e`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/match	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/pretty	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/tidwall/sjson	`v1.2.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.4`	indirect
Go	go.mau.fi/zeroconfig	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/ratelimit	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.38.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.48.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/check.v1	`v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2	`v2.2.1`	indirect
Go	maunium.net/go/mauflag	`v1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiodns	`—`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`—`	indirect
PyPI	aiosqlite	`—`	indirect
PyPI	asyncpg	`—`	indirect
PyPI	base58	`—`	indirect
PyPI	black	`—`	indirect
PyPI	brotli	`—`	indirect
PyPI	commonmark	`—`	indirect
PyPI	cryptg	`—`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mako	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mautrix	`—`	indirect
PyPI	phonenumbers	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`—`	indirect
PyPI	prometheus-client	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pycryptodome	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-magic	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-olm	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-socks	`—`	indirect
PyPI	qrcode	`—`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`—`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	tulir-telethon	`1.99.0a6`	indirect
PyPI	unpaddedbase64	`—`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 65 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records