Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 14:17 UTC

maxmind / GeoIP2-python

Python code for GeoIP2 webservice client and database reader

PythonApache-2.0★ 1,217 stars⑂ 142 forkssince Apr 2013View on GitHub ↗

maxmind/GeoIP2-python holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (73/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MaxMindOrganization · verified domain
335 followers100 public repossince Nov 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIgeoip25.3.017,934,7574541 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume481 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year481
human_commit_share0.59
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases46 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 41 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~189 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count46
latest_release_tagv5.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release41
mean_days_between_releases189
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50/60Stars1,217 stars
17.9/25Forks142 forks
9.2/15Watchers47 watchers
Inputs used
forks142
stars1,217
watchers47
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads17,934,757 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgeoip2
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads17,934,757
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.574
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
28.9/30PR acceptance405/421 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs405
open_issues2
closed_issues60
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.968
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.2/25Owner reach335 followers of maxmind
25/25Track record100 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers335
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmaxmind
public_repos100
account_age_days5,405

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 41 days ago
20/20Version history45 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgeoip2
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://geoip2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgeoip, mmdb, geoip2, maxmind
has_wikino
homepagehttps://geoip2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
docs_sitehttps://geoip2.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

86Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

83Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Reviewno data
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Code-Review, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:geoip2@5.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

93Exceptional · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history55 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.932
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,518
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocs/Makefile, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checkingsrc/geoip2/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance41 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/geoip2/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.07
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.41
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (src/geoip2/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes29,453
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,217GitHub stars
31contributors
481commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
46releases
1bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 142 ⇿
0Stars
142Forks
39Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014132013-082019-092025-10
Major 4Minor 23Patch 12

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10
8.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 14:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 18 changesets
10Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp>=3.14.1,<4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImaxminddb>=3.0.0,<4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.24.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPImaxminddb3.1.1direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.0.5indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.6.15indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.7.0indirect
PyPIgeoip25.3.0indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.5.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.3.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.10.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-httpserver1.1.5indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.2.2indirect
PyPIruff0.15.22indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItox4.53.0indirect
PyPItox-uv1.36.0indirect
PyPItox-uv-bare1.36.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuv0.11.15indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.1.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.6indirect
PyPIyarl1.20.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:geoip2@5.3.0 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.