Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 08:35 UTC

me-viper / opadotnet

Open Policy Agent dotnet core SDK

C#MIT★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗
#dotnet-core#opa#openpolicyagent#wasm

me-viper/opadotnet holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andrii KurochkaPersonal account
4 followers14 public repossince Nov 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

55Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 19 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~111.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count19
latest_release_tagv2026.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases111.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

35Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

56Moderate
How it's scored
31.8/42Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues9
closed_issues28
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.757
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of me-viper
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginme-viper
public_repos14
account_age_days5,721
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://me-viper.github.io/OpaDotNet/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdotnet-core, opa, openpolicyagent, wasm
has_wikino
homepagehttps://me-viper.github.io/OpaDotNet/
docs_sitehttps://me-viper.github.io/OpaDotNet/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
3.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/222 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes39,508
source_files_sampled222
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
21commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
19releases
1bus factor
9open issues
—package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 08:35 UTC

5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/agnivade/levenshtein1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v44.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ini/ini1.67.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/glob0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-json0.10.5indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagic1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsig1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsig-secp256k11.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httpcc1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprc/v33.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v33.0.11indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/option1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/option/v22.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opa1.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.23.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.66.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metrics0.0.0-20250401214520-65e299d6c5c9indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asm1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.4-0.20230606125235-dd1b4c2e81afindirect
Gogithub.com/tchap/go-patricia/v22.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjson1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/vektah/gqlparser/v22.5.30indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointer0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreference0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/yashtewari/glob-intersection0.2.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.38.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v22.4.2indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.36.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.9indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.6.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.6indirect
NuGetDotNext.Threading5.26.1indirect
NuGetIPNetwork23.4.832indirect
NuGetJsonPatch.Net3.3.0indirect
NuGetJsonSchema.Net7.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing8.0.22indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers3.3.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testing10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.FileSystemGlobbing10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Some.Package7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.0.4indirect
NuGetNetEscapades.Configuration.Yaml3.1.0indirect
NuGetSemver3.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt8.15.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Some.Package5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Some.Package7.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.0indirect
NuGetUntrusted.Package7.0.0indirect
NuGetwasmtime34.0.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v33.2.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.assert3.2.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.extensibility.core3.2.0indirect
NuGetYaml2JsonNode2.2.0indirect
NuGetYamlDotNet16.3.0indirect
NuGetYarp.ReverseProxy2.3.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with me-viper/opadotnet. Read them side by side →

94microsoft/regorusRegorus - A fast, lightweight Rego (OPA policy language) interpreter written in Rust.Exceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional98open-policy-agent/opaOpen Policy Agent (OPA) is an open source, general-purpose policy engine.Exceptional98boa-dev/boaBoa is an embeddable Javascript engine written in Rust.Exceptional98pyodide/pyodidePyodide is a Python distribution for the browser and Node.js based on WebAssemblyExceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.