Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 10:56 UTC

mealie-recipes / mealie

Mealie is a self hosted recipe manager and meal planner with a RestAPI backend and a reactive frontend application built in Vue for a pleasant user experience for the whole family. Easily add recipes into your database by providing the url and mealie will automatically import the relevant data or add a family recipe with the UI editor

Python · Vue · TypeScriptAGPL-3.0★ 13,252 stars⑂ 1,507 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

#meal-plans #self-hosted #recipe-manager

mealie-recipes/mealie holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (63/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MealieOrganization

139 followers7 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36	Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,423 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,423
human_commit_share	0.74
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	52

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~9.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v3.27.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	9.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

94Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 13,252 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,507 forks
9.2/15	Watchers — 46 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,507
stars	13,252
watchers	46
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

44Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 96 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	96
top_contributor_share	0.512

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent

How it's scored

39.3/42	Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
27/30	PR acceptance — 4,527/5,023 decided PRs merged
7.4/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/7 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	4,527
open_issues	130
closed_issues	1,879
prs_merged_7d	36
prs_decided_7d	50
prs_merged_30d	39
prs_decided_30d	54
issue_closed_ratio	0.935
closed_unmerged_prs	496
first_time_authors_30d	7
first_time_prs_merged_30d	4
first_time_prs_decided_30d	7

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
15.4/25	Owner reach — 139 followers of mealie-recipes
16.4/25	Track record — 7 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	139
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	mealie-recipes
public_repos	7
account_age_days	1,803

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 18 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .pylintrc, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.mealie.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	meal-plans, self-hosted, recipe-manager
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.mealie.io
docs_site	https://docs.mealie.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

81Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

76Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	176
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 176 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 74 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	10,719

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

91Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .pylintrc, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 23 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Taskfile.yml
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	frontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.11
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.23

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/942 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	75,235
source_files_sampled	942
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — cookbook, recipes

Inputs used

example_dirs	cookbook, recipes
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

13,252GitHub stars

96contributors

1,423commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

130open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 30 authors (cap 12)
Could not fetch pypi package 'mealie' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,507 ⇿

0Stars

1,507Forks

69Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 2Minor 42Patch 25

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10

7.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 10:56 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 62

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@mdi/js	`^7.4.47`	frontend/package.json
npm	@nuxt/fonts	`^0.11.4`	frontend/package.json
npm	@nuxtjs/i18n	`^10.6.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	@vite-pwa/nuxt	`^0.10.6`	frontend/package.json
npm	@vueuse/core	`^12.7.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	@vueuse/shared	`^14.3.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	axios	`^1.8.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	date-fns	`^4.1.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	dompurify	`^3.4.7`	frontend/package.json
npm	fuse.js	`^7.1.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	isomorphic-dompurify	`^3.4.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	json-editor-vue	`^0.18.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	marked	`^15.0.12`	frontend/package.json
npm	nuxt	`^4.4.6`	frontend/package.json
npm	sse.js	`^2.8.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	ufo	`^1.6.4`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue	`^3.5.35`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue-advanced-cropper	`^2.8.9`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue-draggable-plus	`^0.6.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue-i18n	`^11.4.4`	frontend/package.json
npm	vuetify	`^4.1.2`	frontend/package.json
npm	vuetify-nuxt-module	`^1.0.0-rc.5`	frontend/package.json
PyPI	Jinja2	`==3.1.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	Pillow	`==12.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyYAML	`==6.0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	SQLAlchemy	`==2.0.52`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	alembic	`==1.20.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	apprise	`==1.13.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	bcrypt	`==5.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	extruct	`==0.18.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi	`==0.141.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`==0.28.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	lxml	`==6.1.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	orjson	`==3.12.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`==2.13.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyhumps	`==3.8.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`==2.9.0.post0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dotenv	`==1.2.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-ldap	`==3.4.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-multipart	`==0.0.32`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-slugify	`==9.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	recipe-scrapers	`==15.12.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`==2.34.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tzdata	`==2026.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`==0.53.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`==4.15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	isodate	`==0.7.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	text-unidecode	`==1.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`==3.14.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	authlib	`==1.8.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	html2text	`==2025.4.15`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	paho-mqtt	`==1.6.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`==2.15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pillow-heif	`==1.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyjwt	`==2.14.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	openai	`==3.13.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`==4.16.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	itsdangerous	`==2.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yt-dlp	`==2026.8.19`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ingredient-parser-nlp	`==2.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pint	`==0.26.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx-curl-cffi	`==0.1.5`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 40 direct and 136 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	alembic	`1.20.0`	direct
PyPI	apprise	`1.13.1`	direct
PyPI	authlib	`1.8.0`	direct
PyPI	bcrypt	`5.0.0`	direct
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	extruct	`0.18.0`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.141.1`	direct
PyPI	html2text	`2025.4.15`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx-curl-cffi	`0.1.5`	direct
PyPI	ingredient-parser-nlp	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	isodate	`0.7.2`	direct
PyPI	itsdangerous	`2.2.0`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.3`	direct
PyPI	openai	`3.13.0`	direct
PyPI	orjson	`3.12.0`	direct
PyPI	paho-mqtt	`1.6.1`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	direct
PyPI	pillow-heif	`1.7.0`	direct
PyPI	pint	`0.26.1`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	direct
PyPI	pyhumps	`3.8.0`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.14.0`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	direct
PyPI	python-ldap	`3.4.7`	direct
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	direct
PyPI	python-slugify	`9.0.0`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`3.14.6`	direct
PyPI	recipe-scrapers	`15.12.0`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.52`	direct
PyPI	text-unidecode	`1.3`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	direct
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.4`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.53.0`	direct
PyPI	yt-dlp	`2026.8.19`	direct
npm	@playwright/test	`1.60.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/exe	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linux-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linux-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linuxstatic-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/linuxstatic-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/macos-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/win-arm64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@pnpm/win-x64	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-darwin-arm64	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-darwin-x64	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-gnu	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-musl	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-gnu	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-musl	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-win32-arm64-msvc	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@reflink/reflink-win32-x64-msvc	`0.1.19`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.12.4`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.60.0`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.60.0`	indirect
npm	pnpm	`11.23.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`8.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	cloudpickle	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	coveragepy-lcov	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	curl-cffi	`0.16.3`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.6`	indirect
PyPI	flexcache	`0.3`	indirect
PyPI	flexparser	`0.4`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	html-text	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	html5lib	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	joserfc	`1.7.5`	indirect
PyPI	jstyleson	`0.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	lxml-html-clean	`0.4.5`	indirect
PyPI	mako	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mealie	`3.27.0`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mf2py	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.7`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	oauthlib	`3.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.8`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`2.9.13`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-to-typescript2	`1.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.8`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyrdfa3	`3.6.5`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	rdflib	`7.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.9.10`	indirect
PyPI	requests-oauthlib	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.7`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.70.0`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	types-python-dateutil	`2.9.0.20260807`	indirect
PyPI	types-python-slugify	`8.0.2.20240310`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260906`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20260906`	indirect
PyPI	types-urllib3	`1.26.25.14`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.9`	indirect
PyPI	w3lib	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`17.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 176 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect	high	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records