Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 22:42 UTC

mealie-recipes / mealie

Mealie is a self hosted recipe manager and meal planner with a RestAPI backend and a reactive frontend application built in Vue for a pleasant user experience for the whole family. Easily add recipes into your database by providing the url and mealie will automatically import the relevant data or add a family recipe with the UI editor

Python · Vue · TypeScriptAGPL-3.0★ 13,063 stars⑂ 1,456 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined
#meal-plans#self-hosted#recipe-manager

mealie-recipes/mealie holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MealieOrganization
134 followers7 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,328 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,328
human_commit_share0.55
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.24.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases10.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

77Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

94Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 13,063 stars
25/25Forks — 1,456 forks
9.1/15Watchers — 44 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,456
stars13,063
watchers44
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 96 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled96
top_contributor_share0.52

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 4,342/4,792 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/8 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs4,342
open_issues150
closed_issues1,809
prs_merged_7d23
prs_decided_7d30
prs_merged_30d29
prs_decided_30d38
issue_closed_ratio0.923
closed_unmerged_prs450
first_time_authors_30d8
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d8

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.3/25Owner reach — 134 followers of mealie-recipes
16.3/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers134
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmealie-recipes
public_repos7
account_age_days1,777

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 18 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.mealie.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmeal-plans, self-hosted, recipe-manager
has_wikino
homepagehttps://docs.mealie.io
docs_sitehttps://docs.mealie.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages175
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 175 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 54 of 55 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://code.visualstudio.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.982
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,719

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

81Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 40 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.4

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 2/905 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes65,591
source_files_sampled905
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — cookbook, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook, recipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

13,063GitHub stars
96contributors
1,328commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
150open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 23 authors (cap 12)
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'mealie' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,456 ⇿
0Stars
1,456Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

05001,0001,5001,456362024-032025-062026-08
Major 2Minor 40Patch 25

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10
7.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 22:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@mdi/js^7.4.47frontend/package.json
npm@nuxt/fonts^0.11.4frontend/package.json
npm@nuxtjs/i18n^10.6.0frontend/package.json
npm@vite-pwa/nuxt^0.10.6frontend/package.json
npm@vueuse/core^12.7.0frontend/package.json
npm@vueuse/shared^14.3.0frontend/package.json
npmaxios^1.8.1frontend/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.1.0frontend/package.json
npmdompurify^3.4.7frontend/package.json
npmfuse.js^7.1.0frontend/package.json
npmisomorphic-dompurify^3.4.0frontend/package.json
npmjson-editor-vue^0.18.1frontend/package.json
npmmarked^15.0.12frontend/package.json
npmnuxt^4.4.6frontend/package.json
npmsse.js^2.8.0frontend/package.json
npmufo^1.6.4frontend/package.json
npmvue^3.5.35frontend/package.json
npmvue-advanced-cropper^2.8.9frontend/package.json
npmvue-draggable-plus^0.6.0frontend/package.json
npmvue-i18n^11.4.4frontend/package.json
npmvuetify^4.1.2frontend/package.json
npmvuetify-nuxt-module^1.0.0-rc.5frontend/package.json
PyPIJinja2==3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow==12.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML==6.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.52pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic==1.19.1pyproject.toml
PyPIapprise==1.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbcrypt==5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIextruct==0.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi==0.141.1pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx==0.28.1pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml==6.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIorjson==3.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.13.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpyhumps==3.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil==2.9.0.post0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv==1.2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-ldap==3.4.7pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart==0.0.32pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-slugify==8.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIrecipe-scrapers==15.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPItzdata==2026.3pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn==0.52.4pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4==4.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIisodate==0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPItext-unidecode==1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrapidfuzz==3.14.5pyproject.toml
PyPIauthlib==1.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhtml2text==2025.4.15pyproject.toml
PyPIpaho-mqtt==1.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings==2.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow-heif==1.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt==2.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai==3.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions==4.16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIitsdangerous==2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIyt-dlp==2026.7.4pyproject.toml
PyPIingredient-parser-nlp==2.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpint==0.25.3pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx-curl-cffi==0.1.5pyproject.toml
All dependencies 175

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 40 direct and 135 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIalembic1.19.1direct
PyPIapprise1.12.0direct
PyPIauthlib1.7.2direct
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0direct
PyPIextruct0.18.0direct
PyPIfastapi0.141.1direct
PyPIhtml2text2025.4.15direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIhttpx-curl-cffi0.1.5direct
PyPIingredient-parser-nlp2.7.0direct
PyPIisodate0.7.2direct
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIlxml6.1.2direct
PyPIopenai3.3.1direct
PyPIorjson3.12.0direct
PyPIpaho-mqtt1.6.1direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIpillow-heif1.5.0direct
PyPIpint0.25.3direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0direct
PyPIpyhumps3.8.0direct
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3direct
PyPIpython-ldap3.4.7direct
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32direct
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5direct
PyPIrecipe-scrapers15.12.0direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.52direct
PyPItext-unidecode1.3direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPItzdata2026.3direct
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4direct
PyPIyt-dlp2026.7.4direct
npm@playwright/test1.60.0indirect
npm@pnpm/exe11.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/linux-arm6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/linux-x6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/linuxstatic-arm6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/linuxstatic-x6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/macos-arm6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/win-arm6411.23.0indirect
npm@pnpm/win-x6411.23.0indirect
npm@reflink/reflink0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-darwin-arm640.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-darwin-x640.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-gnu0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-linux-arm64-musl0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-gnu0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-linux-x64-musl0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-win32-arm64-msvc0.1.19indirect
npm@reflink/reflink-win32-x64-msvc0.1.19indirect
npm@types/node24.12.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmplaywright1.60.0indirect
npmplaywright-core1.60.0indirect
npmpnpm11.23.0indirect
npmundici-types7.16.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcoveragepy-lcov0.1.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcurl-cffi0.16.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIflexcache0.3indirect
PyPIflexparser0.4indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.5.5indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhtml-text0.7.1indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.4indirect
PyPIjstyleson0.0.2indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlxml-html-clean0.4.5indirect
PyPImako1.4.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImealie3.24.0indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImf2py2.0.1indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInltk3.10.3indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.12indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-to-typescript21.0.6indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.7indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyrdfa33.6.5indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrdflib7.6.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIruff0.16.3indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260807indirect
PyPItypes-python-slugify8.0.2.20240310indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260815indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-urllib31.26.25.14indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.4indirect
PyPIw3lib2.4.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.6.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 175 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mealie-recipes/mealie. Read them side by side →

99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional98immich-app/immichHigh performance self-hosted photo and video management solution.Exceptional98Agenta-AI/agentaAgenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.Exceptional98SigNoz/signozSigNoz is an open-source, OpenTelemetry-native observability platform for your team and their AI agents. Get logs, metrics, and traces in one tool with features like APM, distributed tracing, log management, infra monitoring, etc. Combined with SigNoz MCP and a native AI teammate (in SigNoz Cloud) it helps you build more resilient apps.Exceptional98Stirling-Tools/Stirling-PDF#1 PDF Application on GitHub that lets you edit PDFs on any device anywhereExceptional97onyx-dot-app/onyxOpen Source AI Platform - AI Chat with advanced features that works with every LLMExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.