Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 18:20 UTC

meawoppl / rust-code-agent-sdks

Rust interfaces to the streaming code protocols.

RustApache-2.0★ 22 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

meawoppl/rust-code-agent-sdks holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MattyGPersonal account
88 followers163 public repossince Jan 2011Cosmic Frontier Labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence25/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume259 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year259
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year25
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.4/60Stars22 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars22
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
50/80Monthly downloads5,585 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmuse-codes, codex-codes, claude-codes, opencode-codes, antigravity-codes
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads22,426
monthly_downloads5,585
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.985
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
28.4/30PR acceptance191/202 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs191
open_issues1
closed_issues127
prs_merged_7d12
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d59
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.992
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14/25Owner reach88 followers of meawoppl
25/25Track record163 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers88
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmeawoppl
public_repos163
account_age_days5,689
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history44 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmuse-codes, codex-codes, claude-codes, opencode-codes, antigravity-codes
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), claude-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), codex-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), muse-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), opencode-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), wirecheck/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/muse-codes
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/muse-codes
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.anthropic.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.anthropic.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes14,493
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml, claude-codes/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), claude-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), codex-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), muse-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), opencode-codes/Cargo.toml ([lints]), wirecheck/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml, claude-codes/Cargo.toml, codex-codes/Cargo.toml, muse-codes/Cargo.toml, opencode-codes/Cargo.toml, wirecheck/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
52.3/55Manageable file sizes6/124 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes300,646
source_files_sampled124
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

22GitHub stars
3contributors
259commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
1open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'wirecheck' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412025-112026-032026-07
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 18:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 51
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserdeantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22.1antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.24.0antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31antigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iologantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhichantigravity-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.41claude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdeclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.18.0claude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.99claude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iologclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhichclaude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportable-pty0.9.0claude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22.1claude-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iologcodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdecodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsoncodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserrorcodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokiocodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhichcodex-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iologmuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdemuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonmuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserrormuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokiomuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhichmuse-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdeopencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonopencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserroropencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12.28opencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest-eventsource0.6.0opencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokioopencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32opencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportpicker0.1.1opencode-codes/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclaude-codeswirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iocodex-codeswirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iomuse-codeswirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioopencode-codeswirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1wirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8wirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokiowirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdewirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_jsonwirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1wirecheck/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3wirecheck/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.