Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 04:48 UTC

meinside / telegram-d2-bot

A Telegram Bot which replies to messages with D2-generated .svg files in .png format.

GoCustom license★ 13 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

meinside/telegram-d2-bot holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sungjin HanPersonal account
56 followers105 public repossince Jan 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/meinside/telegram-d2-botv0.3.47-7416 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases74 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 16 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~29.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count74
latest_release_tagv0.3.47
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release16
mean_days_between_releases29.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars13 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars13
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance9/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.6/25Owner reach56 followers of meinside
25/25Track record105 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmeinside
public_repos105
account_age_days6,085
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 16 days ago
20/20Version history74 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/meinside/telegram-d2-bot
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish16

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsd2, telegram-bot
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages88
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 88 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.4/40Legible commit history28 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.308
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes12,712
source_files_sampled3
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

13GitHub stars
1contributors
39commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
74releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212024-072024-092024-11
Major 0Minor 0Patch 8
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 04:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/infisical/go-sdkv0.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/meinside/telegram-bot-gov0.13.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/meinside/version-gov0.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/mxschmitt/playwright-gov0.6201.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/tailscale/hujsonv0.0.0-20260727124030-b80ff77dac4fgo.mod
Gooss.terrastruct.com/d2v0.7.2go.mod
All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 82 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/infisical/go-sdkv0.8.0direct
Gogithub.com/meinside/telegram-bot-gov0.13.10direct
Gogithub.com/meinside/version-gov0.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/mxschmitt/playwright-gov0.6100.0direct
Gogithub.com/tailscale/hujsonv0.0.0-20260722022634-78b5b162ee49direct
Gooss.terrastruct.com/d2v0.7.1direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.22.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iamv1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/cascadiav1.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.32indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.33.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.38.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.45.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.4indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/deckarep/golang-set/v2v2.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2v2.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/dop251/gojav0.0.0-20260723142020-b4aef50fa347indirect
Gogithub.com/dsoprea/go-exif/v3v3.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dsoprea/go-loggingv0.0.0-20200710184922-b02d349568ddindirect
Gogithub.com/dsoprea/go-png-image-structure/v2v2.0.0-20210512210324-29b889a6093dindirect
Gogithub.com/dsoprea/go-utility/v2v2.0.0-20221003172846-a3e1774ef349indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-resty/resty/v2v2.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sourcemap/sourcemapv2.1.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/go-stack/stackv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/freetypev0.0.0-20170609003504-e2365dfdc4a0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/geov0.0.0-20260713102120-857a528af641indirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20260709232956-b9395ee17fa0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.19indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/mazznoer/csscolorparserv0.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/oracle/oci-go-sdk/v65v65.121.1indirect
Gogithub.com/playwright-community/playwright-gov0.4702.0indirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/goqueryv1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sony/gobreaker/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/youmark/pkcs8v0.0.0-20240726163527-a2c0da244d78indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.8.4indirect
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driverv1.17.9indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.69.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.69.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260718201538-764159d718efindirect
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/xerrorsv0.0.0-20240903120638-7835f813f4daindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.290.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260724162435-b2f20204f0dfindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260724162435-b2f20204f0dfindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gooss.terrastruct.com/util-gov0.0.0-20250213174338-243d8661088aindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 88 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.83.1indirecthigh21.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/imagev0.44.0indirectunknown10.45.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.