Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-05 18:21 UTC

meshmakers / mm-common

C#MIT★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

meshmakers/mm-common holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (62/100) and lowest on Vitality (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

45
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

meshmakers.ioOrganization
7 followers41 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.Shared4.3.0-1370 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.Metrics4.3.0-1340 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.Configuration4.3.0-1330 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.Observability4.3.0-10 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.CommandLineParser4.3.0-1350 days agooctodatameshiot

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
13/18Commit volume — 27 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year27
human_commit_share0.51
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.7/80Total downloads — 696,179 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Common.Shared, Meshmakers.Common.Metrics, Meshmakers.Common.Configuration, Meshmakers.Common.Observability, Meshmakers.Common.CommandLineParser
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads696,179
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.838
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
19/30PR acceptance — 105/166 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs105
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs61
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of meshmakers
19.9/25Track record — 41 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmeshmakers
public_repos41
account_age_days1,482

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 137 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Common.Shared, Meshmakers.Common.Metrics, Meshmakers.Common.Configuration, Meshmakers.Common.Observability, Meshmakers.Common.CommandLineParser
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages22
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 22 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.4/40Legible commit history — 31 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.608
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj, src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj, src/Configuration/Configuration.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 49 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.07
toolchain_manifestssrc/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj, src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj, src/Configuration/Configuration.csproj, src/Metrics/Metrics.csproj, src/Observability/Observability.csproj, src/Shared/Shared.csproj, test/CommandLineParserTests/CommandLineParserTests.csproj, test/ConfigurationTests/ConfigurationTests.csproj, test/MetricsTests/MetricsTests.csproj, test/ObservabilityTests/ObservabilityTests.csproj, test/SharedTests/SharedTests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.49
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/115 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes18,536
source_files_sampled115
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
5contributors
27commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-05 18:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.11src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.11src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.11src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.11src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging6.2.0src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.11src/CommandLineParser.Sample/CommandLineParser.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.11src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.11src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj
NuGetSystem.Composition.AttributedModel10.0.11src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.FileSystem.AccessControl5.0.0src/CommandLineParser/CommandLineParser.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.11src/Configuration/Configuration.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Configuration/Configuration.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions22.2.0src/Configuration/Configuration.csproj
NuGetprometheus-net8.2.1src/Metrics/Metrics.csproj
NuGetprometheus-net.AspNetCore8.2.1src/Metrics/Metrics.csproj
NuGetNLog6.2.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2026.2.0src/Shared/Shared.csproj
NuGetSystem.Composition.TypedParts10.0.11src/Shared/Shared.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11src/Shared/Shared.csproj
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 6 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2026.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.11direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNLog6.2.0direct
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging6.2.0direct
NuGetprometheus-net8.2.1direct
NuGetprometheus-net.AspNetCore8.2.1direct
NuGetSystem.Composition.AttributedModel10.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.Composition.TypedParts10.0.11direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions22.2.0direct
NuGetSystem.IO.FileSystem.AccessControl5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.11direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetNSubstitute6.2.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.2.0indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-off4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 22 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.