Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-26 16:26 UTC

meshmakers / octo-common-services

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

meshmakers/octo-common-services holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

meshmakers.ioOrganization
6 followers42 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Swagger3.4.96-2560 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Contracts3.4.96-3240 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Notifications3.4.96-3230 days agooctodatameshiot
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Infrastructure3.4.96-3230 days agooctodatameshiot

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume112 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year112
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 810 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagr3.1.97
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release810
mean_days_between_releases0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56/80Total downloads244,033 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Swagger, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Contracts, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Notifications, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Infrastructure
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads244,033
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.878
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
28.2/30PR acceptance31/33 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs31
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach6 followers of meshmakers
19.8/25Track record42 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmeshmakers
public_repos42
account_age_days1,442

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history324 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Swagger, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Contracts, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Notifications, Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Infrastructure
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages8
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 24 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history93 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.93
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,852
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsamples/SampleWebService/SampleWebService.csproj, src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj, src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice74 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.74
toolchain_manifestssamples/SampleWebService/SampleWebService.csproj, src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj, src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj, src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj, src/Observability/Observability.csproj, src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj, tests/Infrastructure.Tests/Infrastructure.Tests.csproj, tests/TestAssemblyCorrectMigrations/TestAssemblyCorrectMigrations.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/147 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes50,370
source_files_sampled147
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
112commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Meshmakers.Octo.Services.Observability' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-26 16:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Common.DistributionEventHub$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.ServiceClient$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj
NuGetNLog6.2.0src/Contracts/Contracts.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.11.0src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetSnappier1.3.1src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress1.0.0src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contracts.MongoDb$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Infrastructure/Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contracts.MongoDb$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.SourceGeneration$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.MsBuildTasks$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Notifications/Notifications.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Engine.MongoDb$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Console1.18.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol1.18.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus.AspNetCore1.18.0-beta.1src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting1.18.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCore1.18.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Http1.18.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks.ResourceUtilization10.9.0src/Observability/Observability.csproj
NuGetAsp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorer10.0.0src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi10.0.11src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi2.7.5src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI10.2.3src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Swagger/Swagger.csproj
All dependencies 32

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAsp.Versioning.Mvc.ApiExplorer10.0.0direct
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2direct
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Common.DistributionEventHubdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contractsdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.Systemdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.MsBuildTasksdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.SourceGenerationdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contracts.MongoDbdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Engine.MongoDbdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.ServiceClientdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks.ResourceUtilization10.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi2.7.5direct
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.11.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNLog6.2.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Console1.18.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol1.18.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Prometheus.AspNetCore1.18.0-beta.1direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hosting1.18.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCore1.18.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Http1.18.0direct
NuGetSharpCompress1.0.0direct
NuGetSnappier1.3.1direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI10.2.3direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetFakeItEasy9.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetNLog.Web.AspNetCore6.2.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 24 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.