Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-26 21:06 UTC

meshmakers / octo-communication-controller-services

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

meshmakers/octo-communication-controller-services holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

meshmakers.ioOrganization
6 followers42 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System.Communication3.4.96-1980 days agooctodatameshiot

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume271 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year271
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year45
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 810 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagr3.1.97
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release810
mean_days_between_releases0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.1/80Total downloads27,546 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System.Communication
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads27,546
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 92% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.916
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance24/26 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs24
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach6 followers of meshmakers
19.8/25Track record42 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmeshmakers
public_repos42
account_age_days1,442

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history198 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System.Communication
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 19 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes87,706
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/CommunicationControllerServices.Resources/CommunicationControllerServices.Resources.csproj, src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj, src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice91 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.91
toolchain_manifestssrc/CommunicationControllerServices.Resources/CommunicationControllerServices.Resources.csproj, src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj, src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj, tests/CommunicationControllerService.Tests/CommunicationControllerService.Tests.csproj, tests/CommunicationControllerServices.IntegrationTests/CommunicationControllerServices.IntegrationTests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes2/174 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes99,855
source_files_sampled174
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
7contributors
271commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-26 21:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer10.0.11src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnect10.0.11src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetNJsonSchema11.6.1src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetNLog.Web.AspNetCore6.2.0src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet18.1.0src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Common$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Swagger$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Infrastructure$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Observability$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Notifications$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Engine.MongoDb$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/CommunicationControllerServices/CommunicationControllerServices.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.SourceGeneration$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.MsBuildTasks$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System.Bot$(OctoCkModelVersion)src/SystemCommunicationCkModel/SystemCommunicationCkModel.csproj
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Models.System.Botdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.MsBuildTasksdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.SourceGenerationdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contractsdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Engine.MongoDbdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Commondirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Infrastructuredirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Notificationsdirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Observabilitydirect
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Services.Swaggerdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnect10.0.11direct
NuGetNJsonSchema11.6.1direct
NuGetNLog.Web.AspNetCore6.2.0direct
NuGetYamlDotNet18.1.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions8.10.0indirect
NuGetMartinCostello.Logging.XUnit.v30.7.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0indirect
NuGetNSubstitute6.2.0indirect
NuGetNSubstitute.Analyzers.CSharp1.0.17indirect
NuGetSSH.NET2026.0.0indirect
NuGetTestcontainers.MongoDb4.14.0indirect
NuGetTUnit1.65.63indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 19 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.