Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 04:44 UTC

mesosphere / dkp-cli-runtime

Common packages for DKP CLIs

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated 74 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

89 followers24 public repossince Feb 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/corev0.7.4-1474 days ago
Gogithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/extensionsv0.7.3-131175 days ago
Gogithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/symlink-reexecv0.7.3-141175 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

48Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 74 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push74
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 74 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~183.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv0.7.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release74
mean_days_between_releases183.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars0
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.698
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
5/30PR acceptance — 35/212 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 21/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs177
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.1/25Owner reach — 89 followers of mesosphere
22.2/25Track record — 24 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers89
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmesosphere
public_repos24
account_age_days5,006

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 74 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/core, github.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/extensions, github.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/symlink-reexec
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish74

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 21/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories84
affected_packages9
assessed_packages95
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 7, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 42 of 44 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.955
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 44
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscore/go.mod, example/go.mod, extensions/go.mod, symlink-reexec/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/47 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes16,339
source_files_sampled47
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
8contributors
2commits, last 12 months
74days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212023-112023-112023-11
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 04:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests2 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 21/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.2.3core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jwalton/gchalkv1.3.0core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.17core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.5.0core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.0core/go.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.80.1core/go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.3.0core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.5.0extensions/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5extensions/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.25.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.25.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/cli-runtimev0.25.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.25.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/component-basev0.25.0extensions/go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20220728103510-ee6ede2d64edextensions/go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.13.0extensions/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.0symlink-reexec/go.mod
All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 78 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.2.3direct
Gogithub.com/jwalton/gchalk1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.17direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/cli-runtime0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/client-go0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/component-base0.25.0direct
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.70.1direct
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.80.1direct
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220728103510-ee6ede2d64eddirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220823124924-e9cbc92d1a73direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.13.0direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v22.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch4.12.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch5.6.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v55.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errors1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errors1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.19.14indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.22.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btree1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btree1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.5.7-v3refsindirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/shlex0.0.0-20191202100458-e7afc7fbc510indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gregjones/httpcache0.0.0-20180305231024-9cad4c3443a7indirect
Gogithub.com/gregjones/httpcache0.0.0-20190611155906-901d90724c79indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.12indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/jwalton/go-supportscolor1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/liggitt/tabwriter0.0.0-20181228230101-89fcab3d43deindirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.6indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/core0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mesosphere/dkp-cli-runtime/extensions0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/monochromegane/go-gitignore0.0.0-20200626010858-205db1a8cc00indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/peterbourgon/diskv2.0.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/purell1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/urlesc0.0.0-20170810143723-de5bf2ad4578indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v22.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/objx0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xlab/treeprint1.1.0indirect
Gogo.starlark.net0.0.0-20200306205701-8dd3e2ee1dd5indirect
Gogo.starlark.net0.0.0-20220817180228-f738f5508c12indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220722155237-a158d28d115bindirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220909164309-bea034e7d591indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20211104180415-d3ed0bb246c8indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220909003341-f21342109be1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20220722155257-8c9f86f7a55findirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.6.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.0.0-20210927222741-03fcf44c2211indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.0.0-20220722155259-a9ba230a4035indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.3.7indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220609170525-579cf78fd858indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220722155302-e5dcc9cfc0b9indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220803162953-67bda5d908f1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220803164354-a70c9af30aeaindirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20220713155537-f223a00ba0e2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api0.12.1indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml0.13.9indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.2.3indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220722155237-a158d28d115bindirecthigh3612.0.2
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220909164309-bea034e7d591indirecthigh3412.0.2
golang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20211104180415-d3ed0bb246c8indirecthigh20.27.0
golang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220909003341-f21342109be1indirecthigh20.27.0
golang.org/x/text0.3.7indirecthigh40.41.0
google.golang.org/protobuf1.28.0indirecthigh21.33.0
google.golang.org/protobuf1.28.1indirecthigh21.33.0
golang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20220722155257-8c9f86f7a55findirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/sys0.6.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.