Public record
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 07:37 UTC

metalama / Metalama.Compiler

A fork of Roslyn that adds an extension point that allows for arbitrary code modifications.

C# · Visual Basic .NETMIT★ 41 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Oct 2023forkView on GitHub ↗

metalama/Metalama.Compiler holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (28/100). It was last updated today. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MetalamaOrganization
20 followers14 public repossince Jan 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume4,863 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,863
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases37 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tagrelease/2026.1.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26/60Stars41 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars41
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.349
How it's scored
34.5/42Issue resolution82% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance149/162 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs149
open_issues5
closed_issues23
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.821
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
9.5/25Owner reach20 followers of metalama
11.5/25Track record14 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginmetalama
public_repos14
account_age_days539
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://metalama.net
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmetalama, roslyn, compiler, dotnet, csharp
has_wikino
homepagehttps://metalama.net
docs_sitehttps://metalama.net
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages191
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 14 resolved dependencies against OSV. 191 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/Compiler.instructions.md, .github/instructions/IDE.instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/Compiler.instructions.md, .github/instructions/IDE.instructions.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,644
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
52.7/55Manageable file sizes599/14,069 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes6,584,669
source_files_sampled14,069
oversized_source_files599

Key facts

41GitHub stars
100contributors
4,863commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
37releases
5bus factor
5open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch maven package 'Metalama_Metalama20261_MetalamaCompiler:Metalama_Metalama20261_MetalamaCompiler_dsl' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 41 ★ / 0 ⇿
41Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504172023-102025-012026-04

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 07:36 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-latest${teamcity.dsl.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-plugins-latest1.0-SNAPSHOT.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8${kotlin.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-script-runtime${kotlin.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
NuGetNuGet.Versioning6.10.1eng-Metalama/DownloadNetSdkAnalyzers/DownloadNetSdkAnalyzers.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reflection.MetadataLoadContext8.0.0eng-Metalama/DownloadNetSdkAnalyzers/DownloadNetSdkAnalyzers.csproj
NuGetPostSharp.Engineering.BuildTools$(PostSharpEngineeringVersion)eng-Metalama/src/BuildMetalamaCompiler.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build18.0.2eng-Metalama/src/BuildMetalamaCompiler.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework18.0.2eng-Metalama/src/BuildMetalamaCompiler.csproj
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3src/Deployment/RoslynDeployment.csproj
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 192 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-script-runtimedirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-latestdirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-plugins-latest1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Builddirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build18.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Frameworkdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework18.0.2direct
NuGetNuGet.Versioning6.10.1direct
NuGetPostSharp.Engineering.BuildToolsdirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3direct
NuGetSystem.Reflection.MetadataLoadContextdirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.MetadataLoadContext8.0.0direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:teamcity-configs-maven-pluginindirect
NuGetBasic.CompilerLog.Utilindirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net100indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net20indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net40indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net461indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net50indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net60indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net70indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net80indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net90indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.NetStandard13indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.NetStandard20indirect
NuGetBasicUndoindirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNetindirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windowsindirect
NuGetDiffPlexindirect
NuGetDrop.Appindirect
NuGetHumanizer.Coreindirect
NuGetICSharpCode.Decompilerindirect
NuGetInputSimulatorPlusindirect
NuGetMessagePackindirect
NuGetMetalama.Compilerindirect
NuGetMetalama.Compiler2026.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.Web10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locatorindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Coreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Coreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Commonindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeRefactoring.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Featuresindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Elfieindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Test.Resources.Proprietaryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasicindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Analyzer.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.CodeFix.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.CodeRefactoring.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Featuresindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.SourceGenerators.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Workspacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Commonindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuildindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReaderindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader.Converterindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader.Converter.Xmlindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader.PortablePdbindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DotNet.IBCMergeindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configurationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjectionindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.FileSystemGlobbingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Consoleindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console10.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitivesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Guardian.Cli0.199.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ILVerificationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Internal.Performance.CodeMarkers.DesignTimeindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Internal.VisualStudio.Shell.Frameworkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.Redistindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ManifestTool.CrossPlatformindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Metadata.Visualizerindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.win-arm64indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.win-x64indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platformsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net45indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net472indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net481.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ServiceHub.Frameworkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TeamFoundationServer.Clientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModelindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.TranslationLayerindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualBasicindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Cacheindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.CallHierarchy.Package.Definitionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.CodeAnalysis.Sdk.UIindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Compositionindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Copilot.Roslyn.SemanticSearchindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.CoreUtilityindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Debugger.Contractsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Debugger.Engine-implementationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Debugger.Metadata-implementationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Diagnostics.Measurementindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Diagnostics.PerformanceProviderindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Extensibilityindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Extensibility.JsonGenerators.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.ImageCatalogindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.InteractiveWindowindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Languageindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Language.CallHierarchyindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Language.NavigateTo.Interfacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Language.StandardClassificationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Clientindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Client.Implementationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Platform.VSEditorindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.ProjectSystemindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.RemoteControlindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDKindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Searchindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Setup.Configuration.Interopindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Shell.15.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Shell.Stylesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistenceindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Telemetryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Dataindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Internalindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Logicindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.UI.Wpfindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Utilities.Internalindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.VsInteractiveWindowindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.WinForms.Interfacesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Coreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Plugins.SwixBuildindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registryindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Windows.CsWin32indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-arm64indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WindowsDesktop.App.Runtime.win-x64indirect
NuGetMono.Optionsindirect
NuGetMoqindirect
NuGetMSBuild.StructuredLoggerindirect
NuGetNerdbank.Streamsindirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonindirect
NuGetNuGet.ProjectModelindirect
NuGetNuGet.SolutionRestoreManager.Interopindirect
NuGetNuGet.VisualStudioindirect
NuGetNuGet.VisualStudio.Contractsindirect
NuGetSourceBrowserindirect
NuGetSourceGear.sqlite3indirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.bundle_greenindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.coreindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3.linuxindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3.osxindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3.v110_xpindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.provider.dynamic_cdeclindirect
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.provider.e_sqlite3.net45indirect
NuGetStreamJsonRpcindirect
NuGetSystem.Buffersindirect
NuGetSystem.CodeDomindirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutableindirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLineindirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Compositionindirect
NuGetSystem.Compositionindirect
NuGetSystem.Composition.AttributedModelindirect
NuGetSystem.Composition.Conventionindirect
NuGetSystem.Composition.Hostingindirect
NuGetSystem.Composition.Runtimeindirect
NuGetSystem.Composition.TypedPartsindirect
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManagerindirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSourceindirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.EventLogindirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashingindirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Pipelinesindirect
NuGetSystem.Managementindirect
NuGetSystem.Memoryindirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectorsindirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Metadataindirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensionsindirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafeindirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.ProtectedDataindirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Permissionsindirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.CodePagesindirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Webindirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsonindirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Channelsindirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Dataflowindirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensionsindirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTupleindirect
NuGetUIAComWrapperindirect
NuGetVsWebsite.Interopindirect
NuGetXenoAtom.Logging1.1.2indirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit.abstractionsindirect
NuGetxunit.assertindirect
NuGetXunit.Combinatorialindirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.coreindirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.executionindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.utilityindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 14 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 191 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.