Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 04:00 UTC

microsoft / FASTER

Fast persistent recoverable log and key-value store + cache, in C# and C++.

C# · C++MIT★ 6,639 stars⑂ 596 forkssince Aug 2018View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/FASTER holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (91/100) and lowest on Vitality (44/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
128,560 followers8,289 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

44Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume3 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 843 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.6.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release843
mean_days_between_releases30.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

91Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars6,639 stars
23.1/25Forks596 forks
12.4/15Watchers174 watchers
Inputs used
forks596
stars6,639
watchers174
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 74% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth61 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled61
top_contributor_share0.744
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance475/560 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 23/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs475
open_issues31
closed_issues311
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs85
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach128,560 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record8,289 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers128,560
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,289
account_age_days4,643

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://aka.ms/FASTER
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicskey-value-store, hash-table, persistent, recoverable, concurrent, multi-threaded, library, logging, indexing
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://aka.ms/FASTER
docs_sitehttps://aka.ms/FASTER
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 23/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages22
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 22 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.6/40Legible commit history63 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.649
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapcs/benchmark/FASTER.benchmark.csproj, cs/performance/BenchmarkDotNet/BenchmarkDotNetTests.csproj, cs/playground/AsyncStress/AsyncStress.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestscs/benchmark/FASTER.benchmark.csproj, cs/performance/BenchmarkDotNet/BenchmarkDotNetTests.csproj, cs/playground/AsyncStress/AsyncStress.csproj, cs/playground/CacheStoreConcurrent/CacheStoreConcurrent.csproj, cs/playground/ClassRecoveryDurability/ClassRecoveryDurability.csproj, cs/playground/FasterLogMLSDTest/FasterLogStress.csproj, cs/playground/MemoryDb/MemoryDb.csproj, cs/playground/SumStore/SumStore.csproj, cs/playground/TstRunner/TstRunner.csproj, cs/remote/benchmark/FASTER.benchmark/FASTER.benchmark.csproj, cs/remote/samples/FixedLenClient/FixedLenClient.csproj, cs/remote/samples/FixedLenServer/FixedLenServer.csproj, cs/remote/samples/VarLenClient/VarLenClient.csproj, cs/remote/samples/VarLenServer/VarLenServer.csproj, cs/remote/src/FASTER.client/FASTER.client.csproj, cs/remote/src/FASTER.common/FASTER.common.csproj, cs/remote/src/FASTER.server/FASTER.server.csproj, cs/remote/test/FASTER.remote.test/FASTER.remote.test.csproj, cs/samples/AzureBackedStore/AzureBackedStore.csproj, cs/samples/CacheStore/CacheStore.csproj, cs/samples/EpvsSample/EpvsSample.csproj, cs/samples/FasterLogPubSub/FasterLogPubSub.csproj, cs/samples/FasterLogSample/FasterLogSample.csproj, cs/samples/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.csproj, cs/samples/ReadAddress/VersionedRead.csproj, cs/samples/ResizableCacheStore/ResizableCacheStore.csproj, cs/samples/SecondaryReaderStore/SecondaryReaderStore.csproj, cs/samples/StoreAsyncApi/StoreAsyncApi.csproj, cs/samples/StoreCheckpointRecover/StoreCheckpointRecover.csproj, cs/samples/StoreCustomTypes/StoreCustomTypes.csproj, cs/samples/StoreDiskReadBenchmark/StoreDiskReadBenchmark.csproj, cs/samples/StoreLogCompaction/StoreLogCompaction.csproj, cs/samples/StoreVarLenTypes/StoreVarLenTypes.csproj, cs/src/core/FASTER.core.csproj, cs/src/devices/AzureStorageDevice/FASTER.devices.AzureStorageDevice.csproj, cs/stress/FASTER.stress.csproj, cs/test/FASTER.test.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes10/562 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes175,705
source_files_sampled562
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6,639GitHub stars
61contributors
3commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
31open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 596 ⇿
0Stars
596Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500600582612018-082022-082026-08
Major 1Minor 9Patch 84

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 04:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests2 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 23/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1cs/stress/FASTER.stress.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.13.3cs/stress/FASTER.stress.csproj
All dependencies 32

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1direct
NuGetNUnit3.13.3direct
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs12.14.1indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.2indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows0.13.2indirect
NuGetMessagePack3.1.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.1.26indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging6.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging7.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Configuration8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.FASTER.Coreindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Interactive.Async6.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4indirect
NuGetxunit.assert2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pagesindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-algoliaindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-feedindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-gistindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-include-cacheindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-paginateindirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemapindirect
RubyGemsjemojiindirect
RubyGemstzinfo-dataindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 22 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.