Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 03:58 UTC

microsoft / FeatureManagement-Dotnet

Microsoft.FeatureManagement provides standardized APIs for enabling feature flags within applications. Utilize this library to secure a consistent experience when developing applications that use patterns such as beta access, rollout, dark deployments, and more.

C#MIT★ 1,181 stars⑂ 129 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/FeatureManagement-Dotnet holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (87/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (60/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,473 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~85.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tag4.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases85.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.8/60Stars — 1,181 stars
17.6/25Forks — 129 forks
8.4/15Watchers — 33 watchers
Inputs used
forks129
stars1,181
watchers33
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Total downloads — 272,647,157 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore, Microsoft.FeatureManagement
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads272,647,157
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.333
How it's scored
33.9/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
24.8/30PR acceptance — 331/400 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs331
open_issues41
closed_issues171
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.807
closed_unmerged_prs69
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 129,473 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record — 8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,473
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,301
account_age_days4,657

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore, Microsoft.FeatureManagement
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

87Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

84Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
1.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 31 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.1/40Legible commit history — 53 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.546
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — examples/BlazorServerApp/BlazorServerApp.csproj, examples/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, examples/FeatureFlagDemo/FeatureFlagDemo.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsexamples/BlazorServerApp/BlazorServerApp.csproj, examples/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, examples/FeatureFlagDemo/FeatureFlagDemo.csproj, examples/ParametersObjectConsoleApp/ParametersObjectConsoleApp.csproj, examples/RazorPages/RazorPages.csproj, examples/TargetingConsoleApp/TargetingConsoleApp.csproj, examples/VariantAndTelemetryDemo/VariantAndTelemetryDemo.csproj, examples/VariantServiceDemo/VariantServiceDemo.csproj, src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore.csproj, src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights.csproj, src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj, tests/Tests.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore/Tests.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore.csproj, tests/Tests.FeatureManagement/Tests.FeatureManagement.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 2/182 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes108,889
source_files_sampled182
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,181GitHub stars
25contributors
32commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
35releases
2bus factor
41open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 129 ⇿
0Stars
129Forks
34Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512142019-072023-012026-08
Major 3Minor 15Patch 4

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.4 / 10
8.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 03:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
8Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.22.0src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions8.0.0src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.Telemetry.ApplicationInsights.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.TimeProvider8.0.1src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource8.0.1src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory8.0.1src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration8.0.0src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder8.0.2src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.1src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory10.0.11src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.11src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.11src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.11src/Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.csproj
All dependencies 31

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.22.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.TimeProvider8.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory8.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder8.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.11direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.1direct
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource8.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore2.22.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.AppConfiguration.AspNetCore8.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables3.1.32indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json3.1.32indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.11.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Async6.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.0indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 31 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.