Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 04:02 UTC

microsoft / VSSDK-Analyzers

Roslyn analyzers for Visual Studio extensions

C# · PowerShellMIT★ 55 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Feb 2018View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/VSSDK-Analyzers holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (70/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,473 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers17.7.113-24153 days agoanalyzersvisualstudiovssdksdk

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 500 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year500
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 5 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,962 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~94.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv16.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,962
mean_days_between_releases94.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.1/60Stars — 55 stars
12.7/25Forks — 34 forks
5.6/15Watchers — 11 watchers
Inputs used
forks34
stars55
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, dev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
71.2/80Total downloads — 7,131,132 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads7,131,132
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 34 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled34
top_contributor_share0.952
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
16.6/30PR acceptance — 212/382 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs212
open_issues3
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.943
closed_unmerged_prs170
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 129,473 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record — 8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,473
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,301
account_age_days4,657

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 153 days ago
20/20Version history — 24 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish153

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsroslyn-analyzer, vssdk, visual-studio
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

82Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

82Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 38 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,646
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj, src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.csproj, test/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.Tests/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 24 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.15
toolchain_manifestssrc/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj, src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.csproj, test/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.Tests/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.24
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/37 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes38,937
source_files_sampled37
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

55GitHub stars
34contributors
500commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
3open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Just.Analyzers' from its registry
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿
0Stars
34Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383332018-022022-042026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 4

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.2 / 10
8.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 04:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Validation—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.CodeFixes.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—src/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers/Microsoft.VisualStudio.SDK.Analyzers.csproj
All dependencies 14

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.BannedApiAnalyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Validation—direct
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing.XUnit—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Designer.Interfaces—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Shell.15.0—indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple—indirect
NuGetxunit.assert—indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v2—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.