Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 23:12 UTC

microsoft / azure-pipelines-task-lib

Libraries for writing VSTS and TFS build tasks

TypeScript · PowerShellMIT★ 459 stars⑂ 282 forkssince Jul 2015View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/azure-pipelines-task-lib holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (89/100) and lowest on Vitality (45/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,649 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmazure-pipelines-task-lib5.279.0113,8949733 days agoazure-pipelinesagentbuildreleaseci-cdtask

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/60Stars — 459 stars
20.4/25Forks — 282 forks
11/15Watchers — 98 watchers
Inputs used
forks282
stars459
watchers98
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
67.4/80Monthly downloads — 113,894 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesazure-pipelines-task-lib
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads113,894
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

89Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 91 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled91
top_contributor_share0.283
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
21.8/30PR acceptance — 514/707 decided PRs merged
10.4/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 22/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs514
open_issues4
closed_issues397
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.99
closed_unmerged_prs193
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d5
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 129,649 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record — 8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,649
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,301
account_age_days4,660

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history — 97 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesazure-pipelines-task-lib
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://aka.ms/tfbuild
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://aka.ms/tfbuild
docs_sitehttps://aka.ms/tfbuild
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 22/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages53
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:azure-pipelines-task-lib@5.279.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 53 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.959
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — powershell/CompiledHelpers/VstsTaskSdk.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — node/docs/tsconfig.json, node/test/tsconfig.json, node/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsnode/docs/tsconfig.json, node/test/tsconfig.json, node/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifestspowershell/CompiledHelpers/VstsTaskSdk.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
51.8/55Manageable file sizes — 4/68 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes100,316
source_files_sampled68
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

459GitHub stars
91contributors
38commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
3bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 282 ⇿
0Stars
282Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030027552015-092021-032026-09

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 23:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 22/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
8Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmadm-zip^0.6.0node/package.json
npmminimatch^3.1.5node/package.json
npmnodejs-file-downloader^4.11.1node/package.json
npmq^1.5.1node/package.json
npmsemver^5.7.2node/package.json
npmshelljs^0.10.0node/package.json
All dependencies 139

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 131 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmadm-zip0.6.0direct
npmminimatch10.2.6direct
npmminimatch3.1.5direct
npmminimatch9.0.9direct
npmnodejs-file-downloader4.13.0direct
npmq1.5.1direct
npmsemver5.7.2direct
npmshelljs0.10.0direct
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@types/minimatch3.0.3indirect
npm@types/mocha10.0.10indirect
npm@types/node16.18.105indirect
npm@types/node20.19.25indirect
npm@types/q1.5.8indirect
npm@types/semver7.5.8indirect
npm@types/shelljs0.10.0indirect
npm@types/shelljs0.8.17indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.18indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.3.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdiff7.0.0indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmexeca5.1.1indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.19.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-stream6.0.1indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob11.1.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmhuman-signals2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-stream2.0.1indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjackspeak4.1.1indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.2indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.2indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmmocha11.8.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnpm-run-path4.0.1indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsanitize-filename1.6.3indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmstrip-final-newline2.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtruncate-utf8-bytes1.0.2indirect
npmtypescript4.9.5indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmutf8-byte-length1.0.5indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool9.3.4indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:azure-pipelines-task-lib@5.279.0 pulls in 53 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.