Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-12 14:48 UTC

microsoft / powerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils

tooltip utility interfaces for creating powerbi custom visuals

TypeScriptCustom license★ 19 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/powerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (85/100) and lowest on Vitality (48/100). It was last updated 32 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
131,485 followers8,356 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmpowerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils7.1.03,5692738 days agopowerbi-visuals-utils

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

48Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 32 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
6.3/18Commit volume — 4 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year4
human_commit_share0.979
days_since_last_push32
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 41 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~169.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tag7.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release41
mean_days_between_releases169.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars — 19 stars
12.5/25Forks — 33 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks33
stars19
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.4/80Monthly downloads — 3,569 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespowerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,569
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 23% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.234
How it's scored
33/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
16.6/30PR acceptance — 42/76 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues3
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.786
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 131,485 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record — 8,356 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers131,485
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,356
account_age_days4,688

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 38 days ago
20/20Version history — 27 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespowerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish38

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:powerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils@7.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.3/40Legible commit history — 32 of 47 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.681
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 48
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstest/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/6 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes16,589
source_files_sampled6
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

19GitHub stars
16contributors
4commits, last 12 months
32days since last push
11releases
3bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿
0Stars
33Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383232016-122021-112026-09
Major 4Minor 1Patch 6

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-12 14:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1CI-Tests4 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmd3-selection^3.0.0package.json
All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 200 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmd3-selection3.0.0direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@blazediff/core1.9.1indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.6.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/d3-selection3.0.11indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.64.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.64.0indirect
npm@vitest/browser4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/browser-playwright4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.4indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmd3-array3.2.4indirect
npmd3-timer3.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.7.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-powerbi-visuals1.1.1indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals17.7.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminternmap2.0.3indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash-es4.18.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.3indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpowerbi-visuals-api5.11.0indirect
npmpowerbi-visuals-utils-formattingmodel7.1.0indirect
npmpowerbi-visuals-utils-testutils7.0.1indirect
npmpowerbi-visuals-utils-typeutils7.0.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.64.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite8.1.2indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:powerbi-visuals-utils-tooltiputils@7.1.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.