Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 05:01 UTC

microsoft / powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin

powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin

JavaScriptMIT★ 40 stars⑂ 32 forkssince May 2018View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (23/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization

125,506 followers8,208 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin	5.0.2	90,336	47	59 days ago	custom visuals powerbi visualization analytics

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

50Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 22 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~107.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	22
latest_release_tag	5.0.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	4
mean_days_between_releases	107.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

43Weak

How it's scored

25.8/60	Stars — 40 stars
12.4/25	Forks — 32 forks
5/15	Watchers — 9 watchers

Inputs used

forks	32
stars	40
watchers	9
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	below_threshold

Community health

65Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

83Excellent

How it's scored

66.1/80	Monthly downloads — 90,336 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	90,336
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	18
top_contributor_share	0.444

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

34/42	Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
26.2/30	PR acceptance — 76/87 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	76
open_issues	4
closed_issues	17
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.81
closed_unmerged_prs	11
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25	Owner reach — 125,506 followers of microsoft
25/25	Track record — 8,208 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	125,506
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	microsoft
public_repos	8,208
account_age_days	4,605

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 59 days ago
20/20	Version history — 47 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	59

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

46Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
2.2/7.5	Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	49
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin@5.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 49 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

23At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

28At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/13 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	14,680
source_files_sampled	13
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

40GitHub stars

18contributors

6commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

22releases

2bus factor

4open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 40 ★ / 0 ⇿

40Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10

5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 05:01 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
3	Maintained	4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
7	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@babel/generator	`^7.29.1`	package.json
npm	@babel/parser	`^7.29.3`	package.json
npm	@babel/traverse	`^7.29.0`	package.json
npm	ajv	`^8.20.0`	package.json
npm	chalk	`^4.1.2`	package.json
npm	compare-versions	`^6.1.1`	package.json
npm	fs-extra	`^11.3.5`	package.json
npm	jszip	`^3.10.1`	package.json
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.0`	package.json
npm	webpack-sources	`^3.4.1`	package.json

All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 125 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/generator	`7.29.1`	direct
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.3`	direct
npm	@babel/traverse	`7.29.0`	direct
npm	ajv	`6.14.0`	direct
npm	ajv	`8.20.0`	direct
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	direct
npm	compare-versions	`6.1.1`	direct
npm	fs-extra	`11.3.5`	direct
npm	jszip	`3.10.1`	direct
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.0`	direct
npm	webpack-sources	`3.4.1`	direct
npm	@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-globals	`7.28.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/template	`7.28.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.39.4`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.7`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@pkgr/core	`0.2.9`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.16.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.6`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.19.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-compat-utils	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`10.1.8`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-es-x	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-n	`17.24.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`5.5.5`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-diff	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	get-tsconfig	`4.13.6`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`15.15.0`	indirect
npm	globrex	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.10`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	immediate	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lie	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	pako	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	powerbi-visuals-api	`5.11.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.8.3`	indirect
npm	prettier-linter-helpers	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-pkg-maps	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.1`	indirect
npm	setimmediate	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	synckit	`0.11.12`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	ts-declaration-location	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:powerbi-visuals-webpack-plugin@5.0.2 pulls in 49 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records