Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 17:32 UTC

mimiro-io / datahub-cli

The MIMIRO Data Hub CLI, known as mim, provides command line control over a MIMIRO data hub instance or any Universal Data Specification (UDA) compliant endpoint

GoApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

mimiro-io/datahub-cli holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MIMIROOrganization

8 followers38 public repossince Jun 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/mimiro-io/datahub-cli	v0.22.4	-	22	34 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

38Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 34 days ago
4.8/36	Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18	Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

commits_last_year	21
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	34
active_weeks_last_year	7

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 56 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 34 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~80.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	56
latest_release_tag	v0.22.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	34
mean_days_between_releases	80.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical

How it's scored

9.8/60	Stars — 5 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
5.3/15	Watchers — 10 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	5
watchers	10
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

58Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	11
top_contributor_share	0.401

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

32.1/42	Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
23/30	PR acceptance — 122/159 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	122
open_issues	16
closed_issues	52
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.765
closed_unmerged_prs	37
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
6.9/25	Owner reach — 8 followers of mimiro-io
23.6/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	8
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	mimiro-io
public_repos	38
account_age_days	2,272

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 34 days ago
20/20	Version history — 22 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/mimiro-io/datahub-cli
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
14/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
2.2/7.5	Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

71Good

How it's scored

13/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: github.com/labstack/echo/v4 v4.13.3 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/text v0.38.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	12
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	74
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, low 1, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 74 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.5/40	Legible commit history — 46 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.46
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/96 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	26,550
source_files_sampled	96
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

5GitHub stars

11contributors

21commits, last 12 months

34days since last push

56releases

2bus factor

16open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

39Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 18Patch 21

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 17:31 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
7	CI-Tests	9 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
3	Maintained	4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 24

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/MichaelMure/go-term-markdown	`v0.1.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/bcicen/jstream	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dop251/goja	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/evanw/esbuild	`v0.25.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/franela/goblin	`v0.0.0-20211003143422-0a4f594942bf`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gofrs/uuid	`v4.4.0+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pterm/pterm	`v0.12.80`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rotisserie/eris	`v0.5.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/skratchdot/open-golang	`v0.0.0-20200116055534-eef842397966`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.9.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.20.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/tidwall/pretty	`v1.2.1`	go.mod
Go	go.etcd.io/bbolt	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3	`v3.13.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5	`v5.2.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2	`v2.1.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/nirasan/go-oauth-pkce-code-verifier	`v0.0.0-20220510032225-4f9f17eaec4c`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.28.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.21.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.13.3`	go.mod

All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 51 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/bcicen/jstream	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3	`v3.13.0`	direct
Go	github.com/evanw/esbuild	`v0.25.1`	direct
Go	github.com/franela/goblin	`v0.0.0-20211003143422-0a4f594942bf`	direct
Go	github.com/gofrs/uuid	`v4.4.0+incompatible`	direct
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5	`v5.2.2`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.13.3`	direct
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2	`v2.1.4`	direct
Go	github.com/michaelmure/go-term-markdown	`v0.1.4`	direct
Go	github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/nirasan/go-oauth-pkce-code-verifier	`v0.0.0-20220510032225-4f9f17eaec4c`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/pterm/pterm	`v0.12.80`	direct
Go	github.com/rotisserie/eris	`v0.5.4`	direct
Go	github.com/skratchdot/open-golang	`v0.0.0-20200116055534-eef842397966`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.20.0`	direct
Go	github.com/tidwall/pretty	`v1.2.1`	direct
Go	go.etcd.io/bbolt	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`v0.28.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.21.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	direct
Go	atomicgo.dev/cursor	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	atomicgo.dev/keyboard	`v0.2.9`	indirect
Go	atomicgo.dev/schedule	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma	`v0.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/containerd/console	`v1.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4	`v4.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/disintegration/imaging	`v1.6.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2	`v1.11.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/eliukblau/pixterm/pkg/ansimage	`v0.0.0-20191210081756-9fb6cf8c2f75`	indirect
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.18.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4	`v4.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-sourcemap/sourcemap	`v2.1.4+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2	`v2.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/gomarkdown/markdown	`v0.0.0-20250311123330-531bef5e742b`	indirect
Go	github.com/gookit/color	`v1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kyokomi/emoji/v2	`v2.2.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/labstack/gommon	`v0.4.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagic	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/httpcc	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/httprc	`v1.0.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/iter	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/option	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/lithammer/fuzzysearch	`v1.1.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.16`	indirect
Go	github.com/michaelmure/go-term-text	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero	`v0.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/segmentio/asm	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sourcegraph/conc	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.14.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.7.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/subosito/gotenv	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/fasttemplate	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/multierr	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20250305212735-054e65f0b394`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/image	`v0.43.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.45.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.43.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 74 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.13.3`	direct	high	2	`5.2.0`
github.com/gomarkdown/markdown	`v0.0.0-20250311123330-531bef5e742b`	indirect	high	2	`0.0.0-20260411013819-759bbc3e3207`
github.com/disintegration/imaging	`v1.6.2`	indirect	low	1	—
golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	direct	unknown	1	`0.39.0`
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	indirect	unknown	4	`0.56.0`
golang.org/x/image	`v0.43.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.45.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.27.0-rc.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records