Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 12:58 UTC

mirnoorata / codexa

Codex-native codebase intelligence: deterministic repo context, change-plan drift review, and verification gating for AI coding agents. Local-first, zero API keys.

TypeScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#ai-coding-agents#code-intelligence#codebase-context#codex#developer-tools#mcp#mcp-server#typescript

mirnoorata/codexa holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (42/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mirnoorataPersonal account
0 followers2 public repossince Jun 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@mirnoorata/codexa0.15.03,431202 days agocodexmcpcode-intelligencesymbol-searchimpact-analysislocal-firstverificationpull-requestgithub-actions

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 116 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year116
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv0.15.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases1.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.1/80Monthly downloads — 3,431 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@mirnoorata/codexa
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,431
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

42Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.867

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 84/103 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs84
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

20At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of mirnoorata
5.6/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmirnoorata
public_repos2
account_age_days381
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@mirnoorata/codexa
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-coding-agents, code-intelligence, codebase-context, codex, developer-tools, mcp, mcp-server, typescript
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,893
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

59Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 4/267 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes109,876
source_files_sampled267
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
116commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 12:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0package.json
npmcommander15.0.0package.json
npmtree-sitter0.21.1package.json
npmtree-sitter-python0.21.0package.json
npmtree-sitter-typescript0.23.2package.json
npmtypescript6.0.3package.json
npmzod4.4.3package.json
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 198 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0direct
npmcommander15.0.0direct
npmtree-sitter0.21.1direct
npmtree-sitter-python0.21.0direct
npmtree-sitter-typescript0.23.2direct
npmtypescript6.0.3direct
npmzod4.4.3direct
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@hono/node-server1.19.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node22.20.0indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmajv8.18.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbody-parser2.2.2indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.0.6indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.5.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhono4.12.25indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.2indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmnode-addon-api8.7.0indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmqs6.15.2indirect
npmrange-parser1.2.1indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.0.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtree-sitter-javascript0.23.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtsx4.23.0indirect
npmtype-is2.0.1indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mirnoorata/codexa. Read them side by side →

98QwenLM/qwen-codeAn open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.Exceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional97modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdkThe official TypeScript SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clientsExceptional99awslabs/mcpOpen source MCP Servers for AWSExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.