Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 16:40 UTC

mollie / magento2

Mollie Payments for Magento 2

PHP · HTMLCustom license★ 113 stars⑂ 68 forkssince Dec 2016View on GitHub ↗

mollie/magento2 holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (27/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MollieOrganization
192 followers86 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume284 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year284
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases30.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.2/60Stars113 stars
15.2/25Forks68 forks
9.2/15Watchers47 watchers
Inputs used
forks68
stars113
watchers47
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
66.3/80Monthly downloads93,444 downloads/month across packagist
6.9/20Registry dependents10 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmollie/magento2
dependents10
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,909,472
monthly_downloads93,444
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth50 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled50
top_contributor_share0.754
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance426/474 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs426
open_issues14
closed_issues556
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.975
closed_unmerged_prs48
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
16.4/25Owner reach192 followers of mollie
25/25Track record86 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers192
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginmollie
public_repos86
account_age_days5,297
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history152 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmollie/magento2
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.mollie.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspayment, creditcard, ideal, bancontact, checkout, sofort, magento2, magento2-extension
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.mollie.com
docs_sitehttps://www.mollie.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
20/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifestscomposer.json
has_codeql_workflowyes
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
11/11Static type checkingTest/End-2-end/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsTest/End-2-end/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePHP with type-check config (Test/End-2-end/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/834 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes25,625
source_files_sampled834
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)etc/schema.graphqls
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesetc/schema.graphqls
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

113GitHub stars
50contributors
284commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
14open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistmollie/mollie-api-php^3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/framework>=103.0.5composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-backend>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-catalog>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-checkout>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-config>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-customer>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-eav>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-payment>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-quote>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-sales>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-sales-rule>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-store>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-tax>=100.3.3composer.json
Packagistmagento/module-ui>=100.3.3composer.json
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistmagento/frameworkdirect
Packagistmagento/module-backenddirect
Packagistmagento/module-catalogdirect
Packagistmagento/module-checkoutdirect
Packagistmagento/module-configdirect
Packagistmagento/module-customerdirect
Packagistmagento/module-eavdirect
Packagistmagento/module-paymentdirect
Packagistmagento/module-quotedirect
Packagistmagento/module-salesdirect
Packagistmagento/module-sales-ruledirect
Packagistmagento/module-storedirect
Packagistmagento/module-taxdirect
Packagistmagento/module-uidirect
Packagistmollie/mollie-api-phpdirect
npm@playwright/test^1.47.2indirect
npm@types/node^22.7.4indirect
npmjunit-report-merger^7.0.0indirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.