Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 22:14 UTC

monad-inc / sdk

Java · PythonNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

monad-inc/sdk holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (1/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Monad Inc.Organization
6 followers22 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/monad-inc/sdkv0.220.2-1,4820 days ago
PyPImonadpoints to another repo — not scored0.1-14433 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume555 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year555
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year50
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.220.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

1Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach6 followers of monad-inc
21.9/25Track record22 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmonad-inc
public_repos22
account_age_days2,316

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history1,482 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/monad-inc/sdk
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpython/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), python/setup.cfg ([flake8]), tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

14Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum
manifestsgo/go.mod, java/build.gradle, java/pom.xml, python/pyproject.toml, python/requirements.txt, python/setup.cfg, python/setup.py, typescript/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: urllib3 2.6.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 120 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories10
affected_packages3
assessed_packages59
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 59 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo/go.mod, java/build.gradle, java/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpython/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), python/setup.cfg ([flake8]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checkingpython/monad/py.typed, typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/monad/py.typed, typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo/go.mod, java/build.gradle, java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes43/3,992 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes501,900
source_files_sampled3,992
oversized_source_files43
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)openapi.json
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesopenapi.json
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
555commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.openapitools:openapi-java-client' from its registry
  • pypi package 'monad' points at a different repository (https://bitbucket.org/pyx/monad/); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogopkg.in/validator.v2v2.0.1go/go.mod
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine${junit-version}java/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2java/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp${okhttp-version}java/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:logging-interceptor${okhttp-version}java/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${gson-version}java/pom.xml
Mavenio.gsonfire:gson-fire${gson-fire-version}java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3${commons-lang3-version}java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.openapitools:jackson-databind-nullable${jackson-databind-nullable-version}java/pom.xml
Mavenjakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api${jakarta.ws.rs-api-version}java/pom.xml
PyPIurllib3(>=2.1.0,<3.0.0)python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil(>=2.8.2)python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic(>=2.11)python/pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions(>=4.7.1)python/pyproject.toml
npmwhatwg-fetch^3.0.0typescript/package.json
npmes6-promise^4.2.4typescript/package.json
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 52 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogopkg.in/validator.v2v2.0.1direct
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2direct
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.10.1direct
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:logging-interceptor4.12.0direct
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp4.12.0direct
Mavenio.gsonfire:gson-fire1.9.0direct
Mavenjakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api2.1.6direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.18.0direct
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine5.10.3direct
Mavenorg.openapitools:jackson-databind-nullable0.2.10direct
npmes6-promise^4.2.4direct
npmwhatwg-fetch^3.0.0direct
PyPIpydanticdirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpython-dateutildirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPItyping-extensionsdirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIurllib3direct
PyPIurllib32.6.3direct
Mavencom.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin2.43.0indirect
Mavenjakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api1.3.5indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.8.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin3.4.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.6.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin2.22.2indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-runner1.10.0indirect
npmtypescript^5.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIcachetools6.2.6indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.19.1indirect
PyPIflake8indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImypyindirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.9.1indirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItoxindirect
PyPItox4.30.3indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutilindirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260124indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.4indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 59 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
urllib32.6.3directhigh42.7.0
filelock3.19.1indirectmoderate43.20.3
pytest8.4.2indirectmoderate29.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, PyPI.