Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 02:38 UTC

mongoosejs / studio

A Mongoose-native MongoDB UI with schema-aware autocomplete, AI-assisted queries, and dashboards that understand your models - not just your data.

JavaScript · HTMLApache-2.0★ 25 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

mongoosejs/studio holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mongoosejsOrganization
42 followers37 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@mongoosejs/studio0.5.133,06520022 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 22 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 754 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year754
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year44

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 72 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count72
latest_release_tag0.5.13
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases10.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars — 25 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars25
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.5/80Monthly downloads — 3,065 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@mongoosejs/studio
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,065
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.805
How it's scored
17.4/42Issue resolution — 42% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 214/231 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs214
open_issues24
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.415
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.7/25Owner reach — 42 followers of mongoosejs
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers42
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmongoosejs
public_repos37
account_age_days4,509

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 200 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@mongoosejs/studio
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mongoosestudio.app
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmongodb, mongodb-gui, mongodb-orm, mongoose, mongoose-plugin
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://mongoosestudio.app
docs_sitehttps://mongoosestudio.app
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
10/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: undici 5.29.0 (high 7.5)
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 243 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages1
assessed_packages270
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:@mongoosejs/studio@0.5.13 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 270 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.7/40Legible commit history — 37 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.37
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/222 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes56,512
source_files_sampled222
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

25GitHub stars
2contributors
754commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
72releases
1bus factor
24open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 02:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@ai-sdk/anthropic2.xpackage.json
npm@ai-sdk/google2.xpackage.json
npm@ai-sdk/openai2.xpackage.json
npmace-builds^1.43.6package.json
npmai5.xpackage.json
npmarchetype0.13.1package.json
npmcsv-stringify6.3.0package.json
npmejson^2.2.3package.json
npmextrovert^0.2.0package.json
npmmarked15.0.12package.json
npmmpath^0.9.0package.json
npmnode-inspect-extracted3.xpackage.json
npmregexp.escape^2.0.1package.json
npmtailwindcss3.4.0package.json
npmtime-commando1.0.1package.json
npmtypescript^6.0.2package.json
npmvue3.xpackage.json
npmvue-toastification^2.0.0-rc.5package.json
npmwebpack5.xpackage.json
npmxss^1.0.15package.json
All dependencies 30

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@ai-sdk/anthropic2.xdirect
npm@ai-sdk/google2.xdirect
npm@ai-sdk/openai2.xdirect
npmace-builds^1.43.6direct
npmai5.xdirect
npmarchetype0.13.1direct
npmcsv-stringify6.3.0direct
npmejson^2.2.3direct
npmextrovert^0.2.0direct
npmmarked15.0.12direct
npmmpath^0.9.0direct
npmnode-inspect-extracted3.xdirect
npmregexp.escape^2.0.1direct
npmtailwindcss3.4.0direct
npmtime-commando1.0.1direct
npmtypescript^6.0.2direct
npmvue3.xdirect
npmvue-toastification^2.0.0-rc.5direct
npmwebpack5.xdirect
npmxss^1.0.15direct
npm@masteringjs/eslint-config0.1.1indirect
npm@nestjs/common^11.1.9indirect
npmaxios1.2.2indirect
npmdedent^1.6.0indirect
npmeslint9.30.0indirect
npmexpress4.xindirect
npmmocha10.2.0indirect
npmmongodb-memory-server^11.0.1indirect
npmmongoose9.xindirect
npmsinon^21.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing npm:@mongoosejs/studio@0.5.13 pulls in 270 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
undici5.29.0indirecthigh128.9.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.