Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 21:33 UTC

monooso / unobserve

Mute and unmute Laravel observers at will.

PHP · Shell · DockerfileMIT★ 83 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Sep 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laravel#laravel-package#php

monooso/unobserve holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Stephen LewisPersonal account
34 followers129 public repossince May 2013Manifest

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistmonooso/unobservev7.0.03,1761653 days agolaravel

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

61Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year16
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 53 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~233.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv7.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release53
mean_days_between_releases233.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

40Weak
How it's scored
31/60Stars — 83 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars83
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

47Weak
How it's scored
46.7/80Monthly downloads — 3,176 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmonooso/unobserve
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads411,086
monthly_downloads3,176
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 83% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.833

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
21.5/30PR acceptance — 33/46 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs33
open_issues0
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.1/25Owner reach — 34 followers of monooso
25/25Track record — 129 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmonooso
public_repos129
account_age_days4,868
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 53 days ago
20/20Version history — 16 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmonooso/unobserve
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish53

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

57Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

62Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, laravel-package, php
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages2
assessed_packages116
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 116 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

16Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
15.9/40Legible commit history — 26 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.299
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/7 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes2,402
source_files_sampled7
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

83GitHub stars
6contributors
16commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121222019-102022-092025-08
Major 5Minor 4Patch 3

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 21:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
4CI-Tests5 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/contracts^13.1.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^13.1.0composer.json
All dependencies 116

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 116 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrick/math0.18.0indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.6.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.4.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.13.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.9indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.1.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework13.20.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.7indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint1.29.3indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.21indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.13indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker3.0.2indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.3indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.35.2indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.31.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.17.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.13.1indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.4indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas11.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core11.0.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.2.20indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core11.3.5indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage12.5.7indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator6.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template5.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer8.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit12.5.31indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.24indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser4.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator7.1.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment8.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter7.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state8.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context7.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type6.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/version6.0.0indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector7.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php861.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid7.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml7.4.14indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.4.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.4indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 116 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.1indirecthigh28.0.1
league/commonmark2.8.3indirecthigh102.10.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with monooso/unobserve. Read them side by side →

94bagisto/bagistoFree and open source laravel eCommerce platformExceptional94statamic/cmsThe core Laravel CMS Composer packageExceptional89SpartnerNL/Laravel-Excel🚀 Supercharged Excel exports and imports in LaravelExcellent98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional95laravel/frameworkLaravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax.Exceptional94craftcms/cmsBuild bespoke content experiences with Craft.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.