Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 15:18 UTC

monyone / aho-corasick

aho-corasick implementation for TypeScript

TypeScriptMIT★ 10 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗

monyone/aho-corasick holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (37/100). It was last updated 33 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

もにょ~んPersonal account
31 followers49 public repossince Mar 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@monyone/aho-corasick1.5.1047,1346033 days agoaho-corasick

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 33 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 170 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year170
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push33
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 58 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv1.1.21
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release58
mean_days_between_releases0.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars — 10 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars10
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.3/80Monthly downloads — 47,134 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@monyone/aho-corasick
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads47,134
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.8/25Owner reach — 31 followers of monyone
24.4/25Track record — 49 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmonyone
public_repos49
account_age_days4,939
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history — 60 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@monyone/aho-corasick
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages3
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — perf/tsconfig.json, src/stream/node/tsconfig.json, test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsperf/tsconfig.json, src/stream/node/tsconfig.json, test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
0/55Manageable file sizes — no source files detected
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes—
source_files_sampled0
oversized_source_files0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

10GitHub stars
1contributors
170commits, last 12 months
33days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 15:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@monyone/aho-corasicklink:../perf/package.json
npm@tanishiking/aho-corasick^0.0.1perf/package.json
npmahocorasick^1.0.2perf/package.json
npmhoshino^2.1.0perf/package.json
npmmodern-ahocorasick1.1.0perf/package.json
npmtynisearch^1.0.11perf/package.json
npmword-match-helper^2.1.0perf/package.json
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 136 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tanishiking/aho-corasick0.0.1direct
npmahocorasick1.0.2direct
npmhoshino2.1.0direct
npmmodern-ahocorasick1.1.0direct
npmtynisearch1.0.11direct
npmword-match-helper2.1.0direct
npm@emnapi/core2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads2.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.2indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.142.0indirect
npm@quansync/fs1.0.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/ahocorasick1.0.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/chance1.1.8indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node24.12.4indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-darwin-arm642.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-darwin-x642.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-linux-arm64-gnu2.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-linux-arm64-musl2.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-linux-x64-gnu2.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-linux-x64-musl2.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-win32-arm64-msvc2.1.0indirect
npm@xn-sakina/hoshino-win32-x64-msvc2.1.0indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-android-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-freebsd-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-android-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-freebsd-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl0.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-arm640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-x640.8.3indirect
npm@yuku-toolchain/types0.8.3indirect
npmansis4.3.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmcac7.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdts-resolver3.0.0indirect
npmempathic2.0.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig5.0.0-beta.5indirect
npmhookable6.1.1indirect
npmimport-without-cache0.4.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmquansync1.0.0indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.1indirect
npmrolldown-plugin-dts0.27.14indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.0.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.0.4indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtsdown0.22.14indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.2indirect
npmunconfig-core7.5.0indirect
npmundici-types7.16.0indirect
npmverkit0.3.1indirect
npmvite8.2.0indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyuku-ast0.8.3indirect
npmyuku-codegen0.8.3indirect
npmyuku-parser0.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
vitest4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.