Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 01:18 UTC

moodlehq / moodle-plugin-ci

Helps running Moodle plugins analysis checks and tests under various CI environments.

PHPGPL-3.0★ 65 stars⑂ 58 forkssince Jun 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#moodle-plugins #test-automation #continuous-integration

moodlehq/moodle-plugin-ci holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (52/100). It was last updated 40 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Moodle HQOrganization

183 followers146 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-plugin-ci	4.5.11	161,822	89	40 days ago	testing github ci travis moodle actions

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 40 days ago
7.6/36	Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18	Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	33
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	40
active_weeks_last_year	11

Release discipline

83Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 64 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~84.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	64
latest_release_tag	4.5.11
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	40
mean_days_between_releases	84.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

52Moderate

How it's scored

29.3/60	Stars — 65 stars
14.6/25	Forks — 58 forks
7.9/15	Watchers — 27 watchers

Inputs used

forks	58
stars	65
watchers	27
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org, travis-ci.com
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good

How it's scored

69.5/80	Monthly downloads — 161,822 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	moodlehq/moodle-plugin-ci
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	3,334,742
monthly_downloads	161,822
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 36 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	36
top_contributor_share	0.353

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

27.9/42	Issue resolution — 66% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 185/206 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	185
open_issues	61
closed_issues	121
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.665
closed_unmerged_prs	21
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.3/25	Owner reach — 183 followers of moodlehq
25/25	Track record — 146 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	183
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	moodlehq
public_repos	146
account_age_days	5,762

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20	Version history — 89 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	moodlehq/moodle-plugin-ci
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

76Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
12/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://moodlehq.github.io/moodle-plugin-ci/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	moodle-plugins, test-automation, continuous-integration
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://moodlehq.github.io/moodle-plugin-ci/
docs_site	https://moodlehq.github.io/moodle-plugin-ci/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 11/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	6.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	87
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 87 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40	Legible commit history — 49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.49
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

70Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/168 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	13,605
source_files_sampled	168
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

65GitHub stars

36contributors

33commits, last 12 months

40days since last push

64releases

2bus factor

61open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 58 ⇿

0Stars

58Forks

64Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 9Patch 53

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10

6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 01:18 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6	CI-Tests	8 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 11/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10	Contributors	project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-cs	`^3.7.0`	composer.json
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-local_ci	`^1.1.4`	composer.json
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-local_moodlecheck	`^1.3.2`	composer.json
Packagist	sebastian/phpcpd	`^6.0.3`	composer.json
Packagist	sebastian/version	`^3.0.2`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/dotenv	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/finder	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/console	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/process	`^5.4`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^1.1.4`	composer.json
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`^5`	composer.json
Packagist	marcj/topsort	`^2.0.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel-zero/phar-updater	`^1.0.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 72 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	laravel-zero/phar-updater	`1.1.1`	direct
Packagist	marcj/topsort	`2.0.0`	direct
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-cs	`3.7.0`	direct
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-local_ci	`1.1.4`	direct
Packagist	moodlehq/moodle-local_moodlecheck	`1.3.2`	direct
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.8.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`1.1.4`	direct
Packagist	sebastian/phpcpd	`6.0.3`	direct
Packagist	sebastian/version	`3.0.2`	direct
Packagist	symfony/console	`5.4.47`	direct
Packagist	symfony/dotenv	`5.4.48`	direct
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`5.4.45`	direct
Packagist	symfony/finder	`5.4.45`	direct
Packagist	symfony/process	`5.4.51`	direct
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`5.4.53`	direct
Packagist	clue/ndjson-react	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`1.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	ergebnis/agent-detector	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	evenement/evenement	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	friendsofphp/php-cs-fixer	`3.95.18`	indirect
Packagist	hamcrest/hamcrest-php	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`1.6.12`	indirect
Packagist	mustache/mustache	`2.14.2`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	pdepend/pdepend	`2.16.2`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-parallel-lint/php-console-color	`1.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-parallel-lint/php-console-highlighter	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpcsstandards/phpcsextra	`1.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpcsstandards/phpcsutils	`1.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpmd/phpmd	`2.15.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`9.2.32`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`9.6.35`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`1.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/event-dispatcher	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/cache	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/child-process	`0.6.7`	indirect
Packagist	react/dns	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/event-loop	`1.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/promise	`3.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/socket	`1.17.0`	indirect
Packagist	react/stream	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`4.0.10`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`4.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`5.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`4.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`5.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`1.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`4.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`3.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.13.6`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/config	`5.4.46`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`5.4.48`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`2.5.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher	`5.4.45`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/event-dispatcher-contracts	`2.5.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`5.4.45`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.41.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php73	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php81	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`2.5.4`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`5.4.45`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`5.4.47`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 87 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records