Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 20:57 UTC

mrdotb / live_react

✨ React inside Phoenix LiveView with seamless end-to-end reactivity

Elixir · JavaScriptMIT★ 271 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

mrdotb/live_react holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (78/100) and lowest on Security (45/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mrdotbPersonal account

85 followers135 public repossince Apr 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Hex	live_react	2.0.0	9,116	11	8 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

64Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

53Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 8 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18	Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	16
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	8
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

80Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 8 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~102.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	8
latest_release_tag	v2.0.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	102.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

53Moderate

How it's scored

39.4/60	Stars — 271 stars
11/25	Forks — 22 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	22
stars	271
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good

How it's scored

52.8/80	Monthly downloads — 9,116 downloads/month across hex
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	live_react
dependents	—
ecosystems	hex
total_downloads	81,007
monthly_downloads	9,116
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.894

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate

How it's scored

31.8/42	Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
21.9/30	PR acceptance — 19/26 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	19
open_issues	8
closed_issues	25
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	3
prs_decided_30d	4
issue_closed_ratio	0.758
closed_unmerged_prs	7
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.9/25	Owner reach — 85 followers of mrdotb
25/25	Track record — 135 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	85
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	mrdotb
public_repos	135
account_age_days	4,538

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20	Version history — 11 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	live_react
ecosystems	hex
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

58Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://live-react.mrdotb.com/examples
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	liveview, react
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://live-react.mrdotb.com/examples
docs_site	https://live-react.mrdotb.com/examples
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 17 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	141
unassessed_packages	10
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 141 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

84Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.1/40	Legible commit history — 63 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.733
agent_instruction_files	CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,024

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — assets/copy/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 86 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	mix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	assets/copy/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.116
toolchain_manifests	mix.exs
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Elixir with type-check config (assets/copy/tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/45 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Elixir
largest_source_bytes	11,520
source_files_sampled	45
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

271GitHub stars

9contributors

16commits, last 12 months

8days since last push

8releases

1bus factor

8open issues

Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'live_react' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿

0Stars

22Forks

8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 1Patch 1

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10

3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 20:57 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5	CI-Tests	3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	17 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Hex	jason	`~> 1.2`	mix.exs
Hex	jsonpatch	`~> 2.3`	mix.exs
Hex	nodejs	`~> 3.1`	mix.exs
Hex	floki	`>= 0.30.0`	mix.exs
Hex	ecto	`~> 3.0`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_ecto	`~> 4.0`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix	`>= 1.7.0`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_html	`>= 3.3.1`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_live_view	`>= 0.18.0`	mix.exs
Hex	telemetry	`~> 0.4 or ~> 1.0`	mix.exs

All dependencies 151

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 151 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@asamuzakjp/css-color	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/color-helpers	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-calc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-color-parser	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-parser-algorithms	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@csstools/css-tokenizer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`^0.5.10`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`^4.1.17`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^18.3.23`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`^18.3.7`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`^4.5.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	cac	`6.7.14`	indirect
npm	chai	`5.3.3`	indirect
npm	check-error	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	cssstyle	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	data-urls	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decimal.js	`10.6.0`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	entities	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	html-encoding-sniffer	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	is-potential-custom-element-name	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`26.1.0`	indirect
npm	loupe	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	nwsapi	`2.2.24`	indirect
npm	parse5	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	pathval	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.19`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	react	`19.2.7`	indirect
npm	react	`^19.1.0`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`19.2.7`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`^19.1.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	rrweb-cssom	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	saxes	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.27.0`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.10.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	symbol-tree	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tinypool	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tinyspy	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	tldts	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	tldts-core	`6.1.86`	indirect
npm	topbar	`^3.0.0`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	tr46	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.8.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.3.6`	indirect
npm	vite	`^7.2.7`	indirect
npm	vite-node	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	vitest	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	w3c-xmlserializer	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	indirect
npm	xml-name-validator	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	xmlchars	`2.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 141 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
@vitest/mocker	`3.2.7`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`
postcss	`8.5.19`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.5.23`
vitest	`3.2.7`	indirect	moderate	1	`5.0.0-rc.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records