Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-31 13:46 UTC

mu88 / mu88.Shared

This NuGet package adds shared functionality so that it can be reused in different .NET apps

C#Custom license★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2024View on GitHub ↗

mu88/mu88.Shared holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mirko 🇪🇺 🇺🇦Personal account
21 followers84 public repossince May 2013Swiss Post

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetmu88.Shared0.0.8-5opentelemetrycontainersdockermicrosoft.net.build.containers

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume107 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year107
human_commit_share0.73
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases37 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recencylatest release 128 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~14.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tag8.1.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release128
mean_days_between_releases14.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.8/80Total downloads31,733 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmu88.Shared
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads31,733
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance9/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.7/25Owner reach21 followers of mu88
25/25Track record84 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmu88
public_repos84
account_age_days4,841
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
0/35Publish recencyno data
20/20Version history5 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmu88.Shared
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Publish recency. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/mu88.Shared/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/mu88.Shared/
docs_sitehttps://www.nuget.org/packages/mu88.Shared/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

90Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://opentelemetry.io/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history73 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://opentelemetry.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,628
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/mu88.HealthCheck/mu88.HealthCheck.csproj, src/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj, tests/DummyAspNetCoreProject/DummyAspNetCoreProject.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestssrc/mu88.HealthCheck/mu88.HealthCheck.csproj, src/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj, tests/DummyAspNetCoreProject/DummyAspNetCoreProject.csproj, tests/DummyAspNetCoreProjectViaNuGet/DummyAspNetCoreProjectViaNuGet.csproj, tests/Tests/Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes33,480
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
107commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
1open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-31 13:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetIDisposableAnalyzerssrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzersrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzerssrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractionssrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Sbom.Targetssrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCoresrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocolsrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hostingsrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.EntityFrameworkCoresrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Processsrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Runtimesrc/mu88.Shared/mu88.Shared.csproj
All dependencies 24

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetIDisposableAnalyzersdirect
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzerdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Sbom.Targetsdirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocoldirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hostingdirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCoredirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.EntityFrameworkCoredirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Processdirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Runtimedirect
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzersdirect
NuGetCliWrapindirect
NuGetDocker.DotNetindirect
NuGetFluentAssertionsindirect
NuGetFluentAssertions.Web.v8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApiindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetNUnitindirect
NuGetNUnit.Analyzersindirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapterindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.InMemoryindirect
NuGetRichardSzalay.MockHttpindirect
NuGetTestcontainersindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.