Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 07:21 UTC

myrgic / cogos

Local Go daemon that gives AI tools persistent shared workspace state. Context assembly, multi-provider inference routing, hash-chained ledger, MCP server.

GoMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceMCP serverTerminal interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

myrgic/cogos holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Myrgic LabsOrganization
1 follower20 public repossince Apr 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogosv0.16.32-5217 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 897 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year897
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.2 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tagv0.16.32
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases3.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
29.5/42Issue resolution — 70% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 421/435 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs421
open_issues53
closed_issues125
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d11
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d41
issue_closed_ratio0.702
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of myrgic
10.5/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmyrgic
public_repos20
account_age_days159

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 52 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/myrgic/cogos
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://myrgic.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, claude-code, context-assembly, golang, local-first, mcp
has_wikino
homepagehttps://myrgic.com
docs_sitehttps://myrgic.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 51 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsenvspec/go.mod, go.mod, harness/go.mod, pkg/bep/go.mod, pkg/cogblock/go.mod, pkg/cogfield/go.mod, pkg/coordination/go.mod, pkg/modality/go.mod, pkg/reconcile/go.mod, pkg/substrate/go.mod, pkg/uri/go.mod, sdk/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 12/812 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes167,099
source_files_sampled812
oversized_source_files12
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — bep_proto/bep.proto
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesbep_proto/bep.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
897commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
53open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 07:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities51 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 44
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/acp-go-sdkv0.13.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.16.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/envspecv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/harnessv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/pkg/cogblockv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/pkg/cogfieldv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/pkg/coordinationv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/pkg/modalityv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/pkg/reconcilev0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/myrgic/cogos/sdkv0.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.17.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.40.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.44.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gooras.land/oras-go/v2v2.6.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0harness/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0harness/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1harness/go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14sdk/go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0sdk/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.24sdk/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1sdk/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.