Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 07:44 UTC

mysticmind / reversemarkdown-net

ReverseMarkdown.Net is a Html to Markdown converter library in C#.

HTMLMIT★ 399 stars⑂ 84 forkssince Jul 2015View on GitHub ↗

mysticmind/reversemarkdown-net holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Babu AnnamalaiPersonal account
85 followers64 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume182 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year182
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases54 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 31 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count54
latest_release_tag6.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases18.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.2/60Stars399 stars
16/25Forks84 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks84
stars399
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadgen.net, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
70.9/80Total downloads6,721,691 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesReverseMarkdown
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads6,721,691
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth24 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.818
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
8/30PR acceptance83/310 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs83
open_issues0
closed_issues117
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs227
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach85 followers of mysticmind
25/25Track record64 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers85
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmysticmind
public_repos64
account_age_days5,043
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 31 days ago
20/20Version history63 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesReverseMarkdown
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish31

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://mysticmind.github.io/reversemarkdown-net/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsconverter-library, html, markdown, netcore, netstandard, dotnet, markdown-to-html
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://mysticmind.github.io/reversemarkdown-net/
docs_sitehttps://mysticmind.github.io/reversemarkdown-net/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages185
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsamples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.Css/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.Css.csproj, samples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.csproj, src/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssamples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.Css/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.Css.csproj, samples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples/ReverseMarkdown.Samples.csproj, src/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark.csproj, src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj, src/ReverseMarkdown/ReverseMarkdown.csproj, tools/ReverseMarkdown.AotSmoke/ReverseMarkdown.AotSmoke.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeHTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/64 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes40,048
source_files_sampled64
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

399GitHub stars
24contributors
182commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
54releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 84 ⇿
0Stars
84Forks
54Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008332015-102021-042026-09
Major 5Minor 44Patch 5

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 07:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8src/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark.csproj
NuGetReverseMarkdown$(RMVersion)src/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark/ReverseMarkdown.Benchmark.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.7.0src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit31.12.5src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2src/ReverseMarkdown.Test/ReverseMarkdown.Test.csproj
NuGetAngleSharp1.5.2src/ReverseMarkdown/ReverseMarkdown.csproj
NuGetPolyfill10.11.2src/ReverseMarkdown/ReverseMarkdown.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.300src/ReverseMarkdown/ReverseMarkdown.csproj
All dependencies 186

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAngleSharp1.5.2direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetMarkdig1.3.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.300direct
NuGetPolyfill10.11.2direct
NuGetReverseMarkdowndirect
NuGetVerify.Xunit31.12.5direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
npm@algolia/abtesting1.21.1indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.55.1indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.55.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.89indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@radarleaf/markdown-it-region-snippets1.2.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.2indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.10indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.10indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.10indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.39indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.39indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.55.1indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmpreact10.29.4indirect
npmproperty-information7.2.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrollup4.62.2indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.5.0indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.39indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
NuGetAngleSharp.Css1.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
vite5.4.21indirecthigh38.0.16
esbuild0.21.5indirectmoderate10.25.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.