Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 16:16 UTC

nanoframework / nanoFirmwareFlasher

🧰 nano firmware flasher nanoff (.NET nanoFramework toolbox)

C#MIT★ 101 stars⑂ 48 forkssince Jul 2019View on GitHub ↗

nanoframework/nanoFirmwareFlasher holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (76/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET nanoFrameworkOrganization
897 followers102 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.FirmwareFlasher2.5.153-1590 days agonanoframeworknanoframeworknetnfnetmfmicro
NuGetnanoff2.5.153-1510 days agonanoframeworknanoframeworknetnfnetmfmicro

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
12.9/18Commit volume26 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year26
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.5.153
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.4/60Stars101 stars
13.9/25Forks48 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks48
stars101
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
60.7/80Total downloads700,298 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnanoFramework.Tools.FirmwareFlasher, nanoff
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads700,298
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 74% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth29 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled29
top_contributor_share0.737
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
26.9/30PR acceptance315/351 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs315
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
21.2/25Owner reach897 followers of nanoframework
25/25Track record102 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers897
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnanoframework
public_repos102
account_age_days3,521
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history159 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnanoFramework.Tools.FirmwareFlasher, nanoff
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

39Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests25 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.nanoframework.net
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnanoframework, esptool, esp32, stm32, hacktoberfest, nanoff, i-am-a-nano-tool
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.nanoframework.net
docs_sitehttps://www.nanoframework.net
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests25 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,698
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes1/148 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes92,766
source_files_sampled148
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

101GitHub stars
29contributors
26commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 16:16 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests25 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetLibUsbDotNet2.2.75nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.22.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration8.0.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.1nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net2.5.10nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning3.6.146nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports8.0.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Library.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.1nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.11.1nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.6.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.6.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.2nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net2.5.10nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tests.csproj
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.1nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net2.5.10nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning3.6.146nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool/nanoFirmwareFlasher.Tool.csproj
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 2 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.2direct
NuGetLibUsbDotNet2.2.75direct
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.22.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration8.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json8.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.11.1direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.6.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.6.0direct
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.Debugger.Net2.5.10direct
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning3.6.146direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports6.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports8.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4direct
NuGetSystem.Private.Uri4.3.2direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5direct
NuGetnanoFramework.Tools.FirmwareFlasher2.2.2indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.