Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 07:08 UTC

nattstack / ui

A collection of reusable React components built with Base UI, TypeScript, CSS Modules

CSS · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined
#components#react#ui#base-ui#tailwindcss#css

nattstack/ui holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (53/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nattPersonal account
57 followers19 public repossince Aug 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmwebpoints to another repo — not scored0.0.249,35134919 days ago—
npm@nattstack/ui0.0.882,291884 days agobase-uicomponentscssreacttailwindcssui

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 916 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year916
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.8/80Monthly downloads — 2,291 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@nattstack/ui
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,291
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
15/30PR acceptance — 2/4 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.7/25Owner reach — 57 followers of nattstack
21.5/25Track record — 19 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers57
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginnattstack
public_repos19
account_age_days3,249
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 88 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@nattstack/ui
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ui.natt.so
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscomponents, react, ui, base-ui, tailwindcss, css
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ui.natt.so
docs_sitehttps://ui.natt.so
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/run-check-fix.mdc, .cursor/rules/use-absolute-imports.mdc, .cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/run-check-fix.mdc, .cursor/rules/use-absolute-imports.mdc, .cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,381

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

12Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — apps/web/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsapps/web/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — CSS with type-check config (apps/web/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/91 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCSS
largest_source_bytes5,175
source_files_sampled91
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
916commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'react-components' from its registry
  • npm package 'web' points at a different repository (https://github.com/creationix/node-web); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@nattstack/ui@0.0.88; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 1 ★ / 1 ⇿
1Stars
1Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0001111112025-112026-012026-03
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 07:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@base-ui/react1.6.0apps/web/package.json
npm@nattstack/iconsnpm:nucleo-ui-outline-18@1.5.0apps/web/package.json
npm@nattstack/uiworkspace:*apps/web/package.json
npm@openpanel/web1.4.1apps/web/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.3.2apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query5.101.2apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router1.170.18apps/web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-start1.168.28apps/web/package.json
npmdate-fns4.4.0apps/web/package.json
npmmotion12.42.2apps/web/package.json
npmnitro3.0.260610-betaapps/web/package.json
npmreact19.2.7apps/web/package.json
npmreact-compare-slider4.0.0apps/web/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.7apps/web/package.json
npmtailwindcss4.3.2apps/web/package.json
npmzustand5.0.14apps/web/package.json
npm@base-ui/react1.6.0packages/ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority0.7.1packages/ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nattstack/ui. Read them side by side →

98algolia/instantsearch⚡️ Libraries for building performant and instant search and and discovery experiences with Algolia. Compatible with JavaScript, TypeScript, React and Vue.Exceptional94innovaccer/design-systemMasala Design System (MDS) is an open-source design system built at Innovaccer. Figma file : https://www.figma.com/community/file/974368355920553546/masala-design-system-web-guidelines Exceptional100ant-design/ant-designAn enterprise-class UI design language and React UI libraryExceptional100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional98Automattic/wp-calypsoThe JavaScript and API powered WordPress.comExceptional98storybookjs/storybookStorybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.