Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 17:31 UTC

nelmio / alice

Expressive fixtures generator

PHPMIT★ 2,540 stars⑂ 329 forkssince Oct 2012View on GitHub ↗

nelmio/alice holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NelmioOrganization
34 followers18 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnelmio/alice3.17.0572,03185146 days agofakerdatatestfixture

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

64Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 34 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence24/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume88 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year88
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year24
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases80 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 146 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~83.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count80
latest_release_tag3.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release146
mean_days_between_releases83.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
55.2/60Stars2,540 stars
21/25Forks329 forks
9/15Watchers43 watchers
Inputs used
forks329
stars2,540
watchers43
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
76.8/80Monthly downloads572,031 downloads/month across packagist
14.8/20Registry dependents165 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnelmio/alice
dependents165
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads45,569,350
monthly_downloads572,031
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 55 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.43
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution91% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance747/855 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs747
open_issues47
closed_issues466
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.908
closed_unmerged_prs108
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.1/25Owner reach34 followers of nelmio
21.3/25Track record18 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnelmio
public_repos18
account_age_days3,702
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 146 days ago
20/20Version history85 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnelmio/alice
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish146

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, faker, alice, symfony, symfony-bundle, fixtures, fixture, manage-fixtures, expression-language
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages23
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 40 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/808 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes144,588
source_files_sampled808
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

2,540GitHub stars
100contributors
88commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
80releases
2bus factor
47open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 17:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfakerphp/faker^1.10composer.json
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy^1.10composer.json
Packagistsebastian/comparator^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php84^1.31composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 63

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfakerphp/fakerdirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copydirect
Packagistsebastian/comparatordirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php84direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.33.0direct
Packagistsymfony/property-accessdirect
Packagistsymfony/yamldirect
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-pluginindirect
Packagistblackfire/php-sdkindirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfidry/php-cs-fixer-config1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.94.2indirect
Packagistinfection/infectionindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecyindirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy-phpunitindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.39indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.42indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.3.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/configindirect
Packagistsymfony/consoleindirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectionindirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/finderindirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernelindirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/runtimeindirect
Packagistsymfony/serializerindirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch7.4.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumperindirect
Packagisttheofidry/composer-inheritance-pluginindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 40 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.