Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 01:30 UTC

nelmio / alice

Expressive fixtures generator

PHPMIT★ 2,538 stars⑂ 328 forkssince Oct 2012View on GitHub ↗

nelmio/alice holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Vitality (59/100). It was last updated 88 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NelmioOrganization
34 followers18 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnelmio/alice3.17.0554,63785199 days agofakerdatatestfixture

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 88 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18Commit volume — 83 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year83
human_commit_share0.52
days_since_last_push88
active_weeks_last_year23
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 80 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 199 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~83.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count80
latest_release_tag3.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release199
mean_days_between_releases83.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
55.2/60Stars — 2,538 stars
21/25Forks — 328 forks
9/15Watchers — 43 watchers
Inputs used
forks328
stars2,538
watchers43
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
76.6/80Monthly downloads — 554,637 downloads/month across packagist
14.8/20Registry dependents — 165 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnelmio/alice
dependents165
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads46,612,784
monthly_downloads554,637
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 55 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.469
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance — 747/855 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs747
open_issues47
closed_issues466
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.908
closed_unmerged_prs108
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.1/25Owner reach — 34 followers of nelmio
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginnelmio
public_repos18
account_age_days3,755
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 199 days ago
20/20Version history — 85 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnelmio/alice
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish199

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, faker, alice, symfony, symfony-bundle, fixtures, fixture, manage-fixtures, expression-language
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages23
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 40 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 52 of 52 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 48 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.48
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/808 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes144,588
source_files_sampled808
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

2,538GitHub stars
99contributors
83commits, last 12 months
88days since last push
80releases
2bus factor
47open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 328 ⇿
0Stars
328Forks
80Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037532652012-102019-092026-07
Major 2Minor 23Patch 47

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 01:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 55 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfakerphp/faker^1.10composer.json
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy^1.10composer.json
Packagistsebastian/comparator^6.0 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php84^1.31composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 63

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfakerphp/faker—direct
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy—direct
Packagistsebastian/comparator—direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php84—direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.33.0direct
Packagistsymfony/property-access—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-plugin—indirect
Packagistblackfire/php-sdk—indirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfidry/php-cs-fixer-config1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.94.2indirect
Packagistinfection/infection—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy—indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.39indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.42indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.3.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/config—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console—indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder—indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/runtime—indirect
Packagistsymfony/serializer—indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch7.4.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagisttheofidry/composer-inheritance-plugin—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 40 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.